Requests & Suggestions
43
VotesFuture Consideration[FEATURE REQUEST]: ER8411 - add LAN LAG (Link Aggregation) feature
Hi Team, @Fae , Could you please tell - do you have in your roadmap a plan to add LAG to ER8411? And can this model support the LAG feature at all? Thank you!
LAG
By
Alex_UTS
· Latest post Friday
by TCWGEngineers
4833Views
2
VotesHello :) A small feature request that would be interesting and probably very easy to implements on Omada devices. Right now, appart on the switches, the SNMP device name set on the controller doesn't
By
K3dare
· Latest post a week ago
by Mitch_Techs
60Views
7
VotesPlain Wireguard support is slowly taking shape, but would be awesome would be support for running tailscale. This would enable businesses to let their ER8411 be part of their VPN Mesh and serve as a p
1496Views
1
VotesFuture ConsiderationAdd IGMP protocol to IP ACL Rule
Please add possibility to choose IGMP IP protocol (number 2) in Managed Switch IP ACL Rule.
90Views
1
VotesPlease add the redirect VLAN action in the Managed Switch ACL policy. This feature was available in older switches, as can be seen in the CLI reference: https://static.tp-link.com/res/down/doc/TL-SG32
172Views
1
VotesHi, Please add IPTV Multicast VLAN option in IPTV configuration of ER8411 router. In consumer routers like Archer BE800/BE550 in IPTV configuration it is possible to set IPTV VLAN, VOIP VLAN and IPTV
149Views
1
VotesHi, Given that almost every Omada router supports multiple WAN connections, it would be beneficial to allow the addition of multiple SSL VPN Servers. This way, users can configure separate SSL VPN Ser
SSL VPN
41Views
2
VotesIt would be nice to permantelty sort that from alphabetical order. Even the Site List and it stick.
By
KimcheeGUN
· Latest post a week ago
by Vincent-TP
66Views
249
VotesAcceptedAdd local DNS server to ER605
Please add a local DNS server, like dnsmasq, to the ER605. It's a bug for a business router that's running DHCP to not be able to resolve local host names.
95378Views
37
VotesTeam, Suggestion (assuming this is not possible within the current firmware): Allow customers to operate the router without using NAT. Meaning allow the device to behave as a special router with firew
8039Views