Tl-R600VPN V4.0 - Please help on WAN and NAT Speed.
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.Tl-R600VPN V4.0 - Please help on WAN and NAT Speed.
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Hi,
If anyone could help me on this I would really appreciate it.
My configuation is as follows:
WAN 1. VDSL 70 Mbps Down 10 Up (Tested direct to computer)
WAN 2. LTE 90 Mbps Down 40 Up (Tested direct to computer)
On the LAN, when running any multi thread speed test,
I get Down a burst at 120-130 Mbps and then it settles at arount 102-103 Mbps
I get on the Upload side 48-50 Mbps consistent,
Now my question is the following why can't I get around 70 + 90 = 160 Mbps Down. I do get around 50 up ( 40 + 10).
I read in the specs of the V4 that the NAT throughput is 680 Mbps.
Is this overstated? is the NAT limited to around 100 Mbps which would explain why I can not get 160?
Thank you for your help.
Geoffroy
https://www.tp-link.com/en/business-networking/vpn-router/tl-r600vpn/#specifications
| PERFORMANCE | |
|---|---|
| Concurrent Session | 20000 |
| NAT Throughput | 680Mbps |
| IPsec VPN Throughput (3DES) | 13Mbps |
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
embarassing to admit but im really dumb lol. i forgot im testing it on a station with a 100Mbps NIC. Transferred to my own station and well
finally some improvement but still missing 100Mbps since 100+75+50=225. Guess its something.
Thank you very much for the help.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Glad to hear it works.
when running speedtest, make sure to select a big ISP server close to you. It can make a huge difference.
You should investigate the ping you had before 136 ms. I can see you now have 6ms.
Good luck
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 4632
Replies: 14
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.