This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.Bridge mode update issues TP_Pharos_V2.1.6_170908
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Re:Bridge mode update issues TP_Pharos_V2.1.6_170908
Yes, I know this post. This is from a hobbyist with few knowledge of radio technology (else he/she would not solder connectors, which are sensitive to GHz frequency, and he/she would use two antennas instead of one for a MIMO device).
If you insist on using omni antennas with a Pharos device working in bridge/repeater mode, get a WBS210 and either a TL-ANT2410MO (if available in your country), which is specially designed for WBS210 (impedance, MIMO, gain etc.) or use a pair of cheaper TL-ANT2408C antennas with RP-SMA connectors fitting also on a WBS210.
If repeating a signal indoor or over very short distances, I would use a TL-WA901ND instead of CPE/WBS. The WA901 also offers bridge and repeater modes. But I do not recommend bridge/repeater modes at all, since it will introduce many-folded problems such as bandwidth degradation, interferences, hidden node problem etc. If you need to repeat a wireless signal at home over a short distance only, then it might be o.k. to use bridge/repeater mode and to hazard the consequences.
What could get overloaded due to CPE's strong signal on very short distances is the receiver of your WiFi router when the CPE is sending. If it gets overloaded, it seems like the "software hangs". Keep in mind that software and hardware of CPE devices are designed to fit a particular use pattern, in this case a directional, long-range PtP or PtMP outdoor link with free LoS. For both modes, PtP and PtMP, they work best with two or more CPEs on both (sending/receiving) sides, albeit a CPE can also feed any consumer device, but in a much smaller area resp. shorter distance (depending on its antenna beam width and the antennas of the connected consumer devices, which most people often forget to take into account in their setups).
What you are trying to do is roughly this:
Antenna beam width of CPE is 65°. Now do the math and you will see which area can be covered over which distance and why repeating the signal in the same direction it originated from does not make much sense.
༺ 0100 1101 0010 10ཏ1 0010 0110 1010 1110 ༻
Bridge mode update issues TP_Pharos_V2.1.6_170908
Hello my friend R1D2, I am from Brazil, state of Piauí in the city of Teresina, I want to tell you, I do not know how and your test are done to and more here the tests are not done on the counter, anymore in the client's house, and after that update, I did for the version, TP_Pharos_V2.1.6_170908, I only had headache, my provider is having many problems, the client radios still only disconnects, from wsb510 and something else I only use tp-link products so much in the tower how much in the house of the clients, in the tower I use, wsb510 plus the panels tl-ant5819ms, and in the client's house I use cpe510 all updated in the Firmware TP_Pharos_V2.1.6_170908, and this Firmware, was wanted very much, so if you knows that it handles Firmware, pass this problem on to them and see with them how a new update will correct this problem, because it is difficult to buy new TP-LINK products from the PHAROS line.
the first time image of wbs510 connected
and in the other image the client's breastplate connected the clients is fallingo
the first time image of wbs510 connected
and in the other image the client's breastplate connected the clients is fallingo
File:
