Uplink Port untagged for VLAN 1 why?
Hello,
connecting Openwrt and Netgear switch I select tagged for all VLAN 1t, 20t on both sides for each Port.
Between Openwrt and TL-SG108PE, I need to leave the connected Port 8 on TPLink switch untagged for VLAN 1.
Port 8 (TL-SG108PE) - (VLAN 1u, 10t )
Should this not also be tagged for VLAN1t , as the bridge between both? OpenWRT I configured here (VLAN 1t, 10t).
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @John404,
You should be able to make VLAN 1 tagged, but I think you would need to have at least one other vlan (dummy vlan) as an untagged member assigned to the PVID on the port.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
ok many thanks will try.
So you mean just on uplink e.g. Port 8 (TL-SG108PE) - (VLAN 1t, 10t, 50u ), or should I leave vlan 50 untagged on all port...
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@John404, assuming VLAN 50 is the dummy vlan, you can just add it to the uplink (trunk) port. The other ports, which I assume are access ports, would already have one untagged VLAN and PVID set.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Just tried to add VLAN50 untagged for all ports 1-8. After I put VLAN 1 tagged for uplink port 1-4,8, WLAN connection is gone...
Just putting tagged on Port 8 - ROuter > Switch , this at least keeps working, 1 step forward.
So need to check why Port 1,2,3, where each a POE EAP650 is runnings, gets kicked out.
Does OMADA EAP not support VLAN 1 tagged?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
as reading more and more, VLAN 1 is maybe not best for main LAN, so will move that to different VLAN number and leave VLAN1 as is.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 55
Replies: 5
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.