L2P VPN client needs to access primary subnet... How?
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
L2P VPN client needs to access primary subnet... How?
Model :
Hardware Version :
Firmware Version :
ISP :
I have a TL-ER6120 router using subnet 192.168.10.0/24
I need to be able to VPN into it and get access to all devices on the main subnet.
When I created the VPN I was forced to specify a different subnet for it's IP pool. (I used 172.168.10.20 - 172.168.10.29)
I can connect just fine, but cannot access any device on the 192.168.10.0 subnet.
There is also a site-to-site IPSec VPN which connects to a second location. It's subnet is 192.168.0.0/24
I know that I SHOULD be able to also reach devices by connecting client-to-lan and access any device on either the 192.168.10.0 or the 192.168.0.0 subnet.
Altho I am not formally trained, I know enough to be dangerous in most cases.
Does this require static routes to be set?
* During the setup I read that I needed to add the subnet for my VPN IP Pool to the Multi-nets NAT tab.
I do, in fact, have an entry there for 172.168.10.0/24
Ultimatellly I would have preferred to specify and IP pool on the 192.168.10.0 subnet, but apparently the TL-ER6120 doesn't like that. (And yes, I tried setting a pool on this subnet outside of the DHCP pool)
If anyone can shed some light that would be great.
Thanks
Hardware Version :
Firmware Version :
ISP :
I have a TL-ER6120 router using subnet 192.168.10.0/24
I need to be able to VPN into it and get access to all devices on the main subnet.
When I created the VPN I was forced to specify a different subnet for it's IP pool. (I used 172.168.10.20 - 172.168.10.29)
I can connect just fine, but cannot access any device on the 192.168.10.0 subnet.
There is also a site-to-site IPSec VPN which connects to a second location. It's subnet is 192.168.0.0/24
I know that I SHOULD be able to also reach devices by connecting client-to-lan and access any device on either the 192.168.10.0 or the 192.168.0.0 subnet.
Altho I am not formally trained, I know enough to be dangerous in most cases.
Does this require static routes to be set?
* During the setup I read that I needed to add the subnet for my VPN IP Pool to the Multi-nets NAT tab.
I do, in fact, have an entry there for 172.168.10.0/24
Ultimatellly I would have preferred to specify and IP pool on the 192.168.10.0 subnet, but apparently the TL-ER6120 doesn't like that. (And yes, I tried setting a pool on this subnet outside of the DHCP pool)
If anyone can shed some light that would be great.
Thanks