Under Consideration IP-port-Group
Under Consideration IP-port-Group
Under ConsiderationIP-port-Group
Posts: 85
Helpful: 34
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2024-09-28
2025-07-07 15:22:31 - last edited 2 weeks ago
Posts: 85
Helpful: 34
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2024-09-28
IP-port-Group
2025-07-07 15:22:31 - last edited 2 weeks ago
Tags:
I would like to kindly request an increase in the entry limit for the IP-port-Group type. The current limitation, which allows for only a few entries, is insufficient for effective network traffic management, especially in more complex environments.
In my opinion, such a low limit should have been reviewed earlier. It is difficult to understand the rationale behind such restrictive constraints — perhaps they stem from internal business policies. Nevertheless, if these devices are intended to serve as forward-looking solutions, such a limited number of ACL rules does not meet modern user expectations.

#1
Options
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Module Manage
Announcement Manage
Set as Sub Thread
Cancel Linking?
11 Reply
Posts: 8
Helpful: 1
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2026-02-18
RE:IP-port-Group
Wednesday
Make it possible to work with a large number of ip groups in the controller. Why can the powerful ER8411 router handle only 16 groups of ip addresses with 16 subnets each? This severely limits routing in the business segment. It would also be extremely useful to import your IP address lists directly into the controller. Can a 26KB file with 1,500 CIDR addresses make such a powerful piece of hardware freeze?
#12
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Module Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 85
Helpful: 34
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2024-09-28
2025-07-07 15:22:31 - last edited 2 weeks ago
Posts: 85
Helpful: 34
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2024-09-28
Information
Helpful: 12
Views: 3526
Replies: 11
Voters 12
Tags
Report Inappropriate Content
Transfer Module
New message
