EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)

EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)

30 Reply
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
Thursday - last edited Thursday

  @Vincent-TP 

You're directly contradicting what @Hank21 stated here: https://community.tp-link.com/en/business/forum/topic/663452?replyId=1350934

The 22dBm broadcast beacon is due to the lack of AFC, so the radio is not permitted to broadcast at full power.

In addition, the datasheet for the EAP783 states the 6GHz antenna gain is 5dBm, not 6.

Lastly, this problem is not new, the EAP783 has behaved this way since it was released.
 

 

Vincent-TP wrote

  @chrisdfw 

@angrynerd 

@chrisdfw 

 

The 28 dBm you set is the EIRP (Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power), which is the final transmit power limited by regulations. The 22 dBm displayed on this page is the actual RF power. The difference of about 6 dB mainly comes from the gain of the EAP783’s built-in antenna (approximately 6 dBi). The calculation formula is: EIRP = actual RF power + antenna gain. Therefore, the actual power of 22 dBm plus the 6 dBi antenna gain exactly achieves your set target of 28 dBm EIRP. This is completely normal and not a malfunction.

 

This change was introduced in a recent firmware update, and we will explain this situation in the release notes going forward. Thank you all for your attention. 

 

 

  1  
  1  
#22
Options
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
Thursday

  @MrAdministrator 

 

Sounds like the best answer is to enable AFC in the firmware.  Do you have a ETA?

MrAdministrator wrote

  @Vincent-TP 

You're directly contradicting what @Hank21 stated here: https://community.tp-link.com/en/business/forum/topic/663452?replyId=1350934

The 22dBm broadcast beacon is due to the lack of AFC, so the radio is not permitted to broadcast at full power.

In addition, the datasheet for the EAP783 states the 6GHz antenna gain is 5dBm, not 6.

Lastly, this problem is not new, the EAP783 has behaved this way since it was released.
 

 

Vincent-TP wrote

  @chrisdfw 

@angrynerd 

@chrisdfw 

 

The 28 dBm you set is the EIRP (Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power), which is the final transmit power limited by regulations. The 22 dBm displayed on this page is the actual RF power. The difference of about 6 dB mainly comes from the gain of the EAP783’s built-in antenna (approximately 6 dBi). The calculation formula is: EIRP = actual RF power + antenna gain. Therefore, the actual power of 22 dBm plus the 6 dBi antenna gain exactly achieves your set target of 28 dBm EIRP. This is completely normal and not a malfunction.

 

This change was introduced in a recent firmware update, and we will explain this situation in the release notes going forward. Thank you all for your attention. 

 

 

 

  0  
  0  
#23
Options
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
Thursday

Is anyone else experiencing the slow 2,4ghz speeds with this firmware?

  0  
  0  
#24
Options
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
Friday

Hi  @MrAdministrator 

 

My apologies, what I mentioned yesterday was slightly inaccurate. The 6 dBi is not antenna gain, but MIMO gain. The MIMO gain is 6 dBi. This change was indeed introduced recently, and previous versions did not display it this way. Here is a screenshot from our earlier version.

 

 

MrAdministrator wrote

  @Vincent-TP 

You're directly contradicting what @Hank21 stated here: https://community.tp-link.com/en/business/forum/topic/663452?replyId=1350934

The 22dBm broadcast beacon is due to the lack of AFC, so the radio is not permitted to broadcast at full power.

In addition, the datasheet for the EAP783 states the 6GHz antenna gain is 5dBm, not 6.

Lastly, this problem is not new, the EAP783 has behaved this way since it was released.
 

 

Vincent-TP wrote

  @chrisdfw 

@angrynerd 

@chrisdfw 

 

The 28 dBm you set is the EIRP (Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power), which is the final transmit power limited by regulations. The 22 dBm displayed on this page is the actual RF power. The difference of about 6 dB mainly comes from the gain of the EAP783’s built-in antenna (approximately 6 dBi). The calculation formula is: EIRP = actual RF power + antenna gain. Therefore, the actual power of 22 dBm plus the 6 dBi antenna gain exactly achieves your set target of 28 dBm EIRP. This is completely normal and not a malfunction.

 

This change was introduced in a recent firmware update, and we will explain this situation in the release notes going forward. Thank you all for your attention. 

 

 

 

  1  
  1  
#25
Options
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
Friday

Hi  @nikisima 

 

The speed you described, 70-110 Mbps on 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, is lower than expected but still within a common range, not entirely abnormal.

There are two main reasons:

  1. Low Physical Limit: Under typical configurations (20MHz bandwidth and 2x2 MIMO), the theoretical maximum speed for 2.4GHz is only about 144Mbps. Achieving 50%-75% of that in real-world use is considered decent.
  2. Interference is the Key Bottleneck: An “excellent” signal strength indicates strong signal power, not high signal quality. The 2.4GHz band is congested and highly susceptible to interference from neighboring Wi-Fi networks, Bluetooth devices, and household appliances. In such a high-interference environment, despite strong signal strength, data transmission requires frequent error correction and retransmission, severely dragging down the effective speed.

 

RSSI vs. SNR: What Really Determines Your Wi-Fi Speed? 

 

For 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, achieving a stable throughput of 70-110 Mbps in real-world home environments is an acceptable result, especially as it is entirely sufficient for applications such as connecting smart home devices and web browsing.

nikisima wrote

2.4 Wi-Fi is super slow with this firmware for me on my 783. I only get around 70-110Mbit with excellent signal.

Has anyone tested MLO yet with iPhones, Pixel and Samsung devices? Any issues?

 

  @chrisdfw 


I see a similar thing on 5ghz, it is set to 30dBm but only shows 23dBm.

 

  1  
  1  
#26
Options
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
Friday

I see that EAP773 V1 firmware version EAP773(US)_V1_1.1.5 Build 20251230 has been released, is now generally available. It appears that this prerelease firmware is newer, V1.2.0. I assume if we already installed V1.2.0 we should stick with that until it or a newer version is released vs installing the generally available firmware 1.1.5?

  0  
  0  
#27
Options
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
Friday

Hi  @eap-oma 

 

Yes, this version is newer. You can keep using this firmware to experience the new features.

eap-oma wrote

I see that EAP773 V1 firmware version EAP773(US)_V1_1.1.5 Build 20251230 has been released, is now generally available. It appears that this prerelease firmware is newer, V1.2.0. I assume if we already installed V1.2.0 we should stick with that until it or a newer version is released vs installing the generally available firmware 1.1.5?

 

  1  
  1  
#28
Options
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
20 hours ago

  @Vincent-TP 

 

>Sounds like the best answer is to enable AFC in the firmware.  Do you have a ETA?

 

I didn't see a response to this.  Is it coming anytime soon? 

  0  
  0  
#29
Options
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
20 hours ago

  @mrmbman 

I'm interested in AFC as well.  

  0  
  0  
#30
Options
Re:EAP772v1 EAP773v1 EAP783v1 Adapted to Omada 6.1 Pre-release Firmware (Released on 14th Jan 2026)
17 hours ago

  @Vincent-TP 

The 2,4ghz tests at ~100mbit are in a single house with no other WiFis nearby and no other clients connected. No Bluetooth or other devices that might disturb the signal. Testing in the same room as the AP.


Before the update, I could almost saturate the gigabit connection, now it won't go over ~100Mbit. 5Ghz works as expected.

Transmit and receive link speed is shown as 286 Mbps on my Pixel 9. It is the same, no matter if I use 20Mhz or 40Mhz (40Mhz shows a Receive Link of 270Mbps).

Can anyone else test this?

  0  
  0  
#31
Options