Recommendation to buy a Ip balancing and traffcic control router

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.

Recommendation to buy a Ip balancing and traffcic control router

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Recommendation to buy a Ip balancing and traffcic control router
Recommendation to buy a Ip balancing and traffcic control router
2016-09-27 18:07:52 - last edited 2021-08-21 06:45:16
Model :

Hardware Version :

Firmware Version :

ISP :

I have a network behind two routers:
One router 192.168.2.1/24 with ports redirected to some servers in the 192.168.2.0 network
Another router 192.168.4.1

The 192.168.2.0 network is divided into two subnets (upper half, lower half) physically separated.
I am planning to use a router to connect the 192.168.2.1 router to one WAN port, thje 192.168.4.1 router to another WAN port, and each subnet to one LAN port.
The goal is
1) The incoming connections from the internet through the 192.168.2.1 router must be forwarded to the servers
2) The outgoing connections from the local net must be balanced through 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.4.1 routers
3) Be able to control bandwidth on both subnets


I have been watching TL-ER5120. I wonder if it is the right choice or not.
Any help?

regards
  0      
  0      
#1
Options
2 Reply
Re:Recommendation to buy a Ip balancing and traffcic control router
2016-09-28 10:14:37 - last edited 2021-08-21 06:45:16
hey dude, I think you should also consider the bandwidth provided by your ISP, the NAT throughpt of the ER5120 is 350Mbps, so if you bandwidth is not higher than 200Mbps, that would be nice.
  0  
  0  
#2
Options
Re:Recommendation to buy a Ip balancing and traffcic control router
2016-09-29 00:10:14 - last edited 2021-08-21 06:45:16

ChimB wrote

hey dude, I think you should also consider the bandwidth provided by your ISP, the NAT throughpt of the ER5120 is 350Mbps, so if you bandwidth is not higher than 200Mbps, that would be nice.


It is not, one WAN is 10Mbps an the other is 40Mbps

regards
  0  
  0  
#3
Options