Business Community > All Threads > Nice Comparison of the different SDN deployment options
< All Threads

Nice Comparison of the different SDN deployment options

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.

Nice Comparison of the different SDN deployment options

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Nice Comparison of the different SDN deployment options
Nice Comparison of the different SDN deployment options
2020-09-23 12:49:56
Model: OC200  
Hardware Version: V1
Firmware Version:

I was wondering how the OC-300 will differ from the OC-200 and I found this nice comparison:

 

https://www.tp-link.com/us/business-networking/omada-sdn-controller/oc300/

 

It seems like they are largely identical save for the OC-300 having more horsepower in order to support the management of networking equipment (AP's, SmartSwitches, etc.).

 

  1      
 
  1      
 
#1
Options
1 Reply
Re:Nice Comparison of the different SDN deployment options
2020-09-23 14:36:43

@JSchnee21, OC300 is indeed much more powerful than OC200, pages load faster. It also has a built-in power supply (connecting directly to mains power), so USB-based auto-backup works out of the box, and it can be mounted into a rack with the included mounting brackets.

༺ 0100 1101 0010 10ཏ1 0010 0110 1010 1110 ༻
  0  
  0  
#2
Options

Information

Helpful: 1

Views: 1046

Replies: 1

Related Articles
Mass-deployment
665 0
Home Sample Deployment
297 0
Omada Cloud SDN vs. Other Cloud Services: A Comparison
872 0
Request for implementation op DHCP options 004 and/or 042
1319 2
Do you have a City-Wide Wi-Fi deployment?
94 0
CPE Deployment
932 0
About Us
Press
Copyright © TP-Link Systems Inc. All rights reserved.