P2P TL-WA5210G vs CPE510
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
P2P TL-WA5210G vs CPE510
Posts: 26
Helpful: 1
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-09-15
2015-09-15 06:21:10
Posts: 26
Helpful: 1
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-09-15
P2P TL-WA5210G vs CPE510
2015-09-15 06:21:10
Tags:
Model :
Hardware Version : Not Clear
Firmware Version :
ISP :
I have 2km p2p link using two TL-WA5210G without external antennas for almost 5 years. This link is across center of city which is so crowded with more than 100 wireless links (not home routers) which I see on 2.4GHz with 12dB or more. I also find a few 5GHz networks on my dual-band laptop. Link between two TL-WA5210G is 100% reliable, but speed is low, only 15Mb/s. I wanted higher speed so I ordered two cpe510 yesterday. I have a few questions:
1. Will I have better link and higher throughput with two cpe510 ?
2. Two TL-WA5210G are in bridge p2p mode without AP mode, and it seems that it is the best possible scenario. Reading all posts I saw that everybody advice AP-Client scenario for two cpe510. Should it be wrong if I configure both devices in bridge mode by their MAC addresses, like it is on my TL-WA5210G devices?
Thank you on fast answer, because I have to replace devices or give up till October, 17th.
Hardware Version : Not Clear
Firmware Version :
ISP :
I have 2km p2p link using two TL-WA5210G without external antennas for almost 5 years. This link is across center of city which is so crowded with more than 100 wireless links (not home routers) which I see on 2.4GHz with 12dB or more. I also find a few 5GHz networks on my dual-band laptop. Link between two TL-WA5210G is 100% reliable, but speed is low, only 15Mb/s. I wanted higher speed so I ordered two cpe510 yesterday. I have a few questions:
1. Will I have better link and higher throughput with two cpe510 ?
2. Two TL-WA5210G are in bridge p2p mode without AP mode, and it seems that it is the best possible scenario. Reading all posts I saw that everybody advice AP-Client scenario for two cpe510. Should it be wrong if I configure both devices in bridge mode by their MAC addresses, like it is on my TL-WA5210G devices?
Thank you on fast answer, because I have to replace devices or give up till October, 17th.
#1
Options
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
45 Reply
Posts: 6
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2013-07-13
Re:P2P TL-WA5210G vs CPE510
2015-11-06 13:47:44
To avoid crowded 2.4 Ghz freq. WISPs flash 5210 Version 1, that will let you use other channels like 13 or 14 that are not as crowded as the regulars
It only applys to Version 1 if you have a Ver. 2 forget it, just make sure the interface reads Ver 1, it does not matter what the sticker or the box says, it's what you read on web interface, I had lots of Version 2 on the box and on the sticker, but they where really Version 1, cause that's what the web interface says
It only applys to Version 1 if you have a Ver. 2 forget it, just make sure the interface reads Ver 1, it does not matter what the sticker or the box says, it's what you read on web interface, I had lots of Version 2 on the box and on the sticker, but they where really Version 1, cause that's what the web interface says
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#42
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 2
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-06-28
Re:P2P TL-WA5210G vs CPE510
2016-06-28 16:59:00
I use bandwith control with my wr740n routers, not 5210. If I dont do this I wouldnt have internet. My son starts 20 torrents, watch youtube, chat on fb and play net game same time. I asked him how he could do all this same time.... hmmm kids. There are 7 people who also use my net and a lot of devices (even Pioneer audio receiver and 2 smart Samsung TV-s, etc... Irons, cookers and fridges are still netless). Discovering bandwith control on TP-link devices was solution for me. It is not so simple, you have to tweak bandwith min and max, but once you find sweet spot it is wonderful. Everyone has sence that have unlimited net speed. Bandwith control on cheap TL routers works great!
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#43
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 26
Helpful: 1
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-09-15
Re:P2P TL-WA5210G vs CPE510
2016-07-01 04:24:40
ajay wrote
I use bandwith control with my wr740n routers, not 5210. If I dont do this I wouldnt have internet. My son starts 20 torrents, watch youtube, chat on fb and play net game same time. I asked him how he could do all this same time.... hmmm kids. There are 7 people who also use my net and a lot of devices (even Pioneer audio receiver and 2 smart Samsung TV-s, etc... Irons, cookers and fridges are still netless). Discovering bandwith control on TP-link devices was solution for me. It is not so simple, you have to tweak bandwith min and max, but once you find sweet spot it is wonderful. Everyone has sence that have unlimited net speed. Bandwith control on cheap TL routers works great!
Same here. I have 4 wr740n routers in my net and all works wonderful with sweet spot bandwidth control. I will add one more computer on my network.
Case: Phanteks Enthoo pro window
Psu: Chieftec modular cft 750-14cf
CPU: 2x Intel Xeon e5-2670
Motherboard: Intel® Server Board S2600COEIOC
RAM: 64GB 8x8GB ecc ddr3 1333
GPU: RX 480 8GB Powercolor
Sound: Asus Xonar DSX
Additional 4xUSB3.0
Raid: Intel® Integrated RAID Module RMS25KB080
SSD: 2x 240GB
HDD: 4x 2TB
Custom build Atmega328 RGB strip lightning controller
Blu Ray writer : LG
Coller: 2xLG-CC-120
Case fans: 20cm front, 14cm back, 2x14cm top
Still not finished. Waiting for courier.....
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#44
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 26
Helpful: 1
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-09-15
Re:P2P TL-WA5210G vs CPE510
2016-07-01 04:28:58
ajay wrote
I use bandwith control with my wr740n routers, not 5210. If I dont do this I wouldnt have internet. My son starts 20 torrents, watch youtube, chat on fb and play net game same time. I asked him how he could do all this same time.... hmmm kids. There are 7 people who also use my net and a lot of devices (even Pioneer audio receiver and 2 smart Samsung TV-s, etc... Irons, cookers and fridges are still netless). Discovering bandwith control on TP-link devices was solution for me. It is not so simple, you have to tweak bandwith min and max, but once you find sweet spot it is wonderful. Everyone has sence that have unlimited net speed. Bandwith control on cheap TL routers works great!
Same here. I have 4 wr740n routers in my net and all works wonderful with sweet spot bandwidth control. I will add one more computer on my network.
Case: Phanteks Enthoo pro window
Psu: Chieftec modular cft 750-14cf
CPU: 2x Intel Xeon e5-2670
Motherboard: Intel® Server Board S2600COEIOC
RAM: 64GB 8x8GB ecc ddr3 1333
GPU: RX 480 8GB Powercolor
Sound: Asus Xonar DSX
Additional 4xUSB3.0
Raid: Intel® Integrated RAID Module RMS25KB080
SSD: 2x 240GB
HDD: 3x 2TB
Custom build Atmega328 RGB strip lightning controller
Blu Ray writer : LG
Coller: 2xLG-CC-120
Case fans: 20cm front, 14cm back, 2x14cm top
Price....... under 1000€
Not so actual but for browsing, simple typing, watching movies and Tetris it will be enough.
Still not finished. Waiting for courier.....
And Phantex case
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#45
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 8
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-06-28
Re:P2P TL-WA5210G vs CPE510
2016-07-01 22:13:51
Máy nén khÃ* mini hay máy bÆ¡m hÆ¡i 0.75hp SPRKCT-9 có Mô tÆ¡ máy quấn bằng dây đồng. Máy có kết cấu nhá» gá»n, tiện dụng cho những công việc đòi há»i di chuyển nhiá»u. Máy bÆ¡m hÆ¡i KCT có dung tÃ*ch 9 LÃ*t khÃ* lÃ* dòng máy có dầu rất được Æ°a chuá»™ng. Máy được sản xuất theo công nghệ tiên tiến của Nháº*t.danymarc wrote
I never seen a 740 or 741 (my first choice too) work 24/7 with stock firmware. Homes here in Mexico due to earthquakes are concrete and steel, lots of them, and that makes a 2.4 freq. router a difficult work, thats why with stock, they dont work well, at least they need a reboot, 2 times a week, with third party solutions that is accomplished automatic, and Gargoyle has the grail in bandwith control, and those 740 or 741 ones, perform next to perfect.
ỨNG DỤNG CÆ* BẢN
BÆ¡m xe, bắn ốc vÃ*t (dùng trong các tiệm sá»*a xe)
Thổi oxy nuôi tôm Tiệm rá»*a xe (bÆ¡m xe, thổi sạch nÆ°á»›c)
Xưởng gỗ (phun sơn PU, thổi sạch vụn gỗ khi chế tác)
Bắn Ä‘inh (tiệm lÃ*m ghế da, yên xe)
Các phòng kỹ thuáº*t, sản xuất (dây chuyá»n lắp ráp sá»* dụng bằng hÆ¡i)
Xịt khô (xe sau khi rá»*a, xịt khô máy lạnh sau khi vệ sinh), xịt bụi máy tÃ*nh, máy photo coppy...
ÄẶC ÄIỂM Ná»”I BẬT
Mô tÆ¡ máy nén khÃ* mini 0.75hp SPRKCT-9 thá»i gian nén đầy bình hÆ¡i 1 phút 30 giây.
Xilanh 47mm, mô tơ 47mm.
Nước sơn tĩnh điện cao cấp, đảm bảo độ bóng đẹp của sản phẩm.
Nhiá»u model thông số cho bạn lá»±a chá»n.
Mô tÆ¡ đồng (giá mô tÆ¡ dây nhôm rẻ hÆ¡n nhiá»u so vá»›i đồng)
THÔNG SỠKỸ THUẬT
Công suất động cơ (HP): 3/4 HP
Ãp suất lÃ*m việc: 8 Bar
Äiện áp / Tần số: 220V / 50Hz
Tốc độ động cơ: 2850 RPM
Dung tÃ*ch bình: 9L
Dung tÃ*ch nhá»›t : 0.25L
LÆ°u lượng khÃ*: 150L/min
Xilanh: 47mm
Quy cách: 54 x 47 x 22cm[right][i]Theo Sá»*a chữa máy nén khÃ*[/i][/right]
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#46
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 26
Helpful: 1
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-09-15
2015-09-15 06:21:10
Posts: 26
Helpful: 1
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-09-15
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 10483
Replies: 45
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.
Tags
Related Articles
Tl-wa5210g vs tl-wa7210n
4580
0
TL-WA7510N vs CPE510
767
0
CPE510 vs TL-WA7510N
1454
0
TL-wa7510 to CPe510
1068
0
Tl-wa5210g
820
0
Report Inappropriate Content
Transfer Module
New message