Business Community > Controllers > May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?
< Controllers

May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.

May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?
May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?
2022-02-25 04:14:47 - last edited 2022-03-22 16:23:19

Got 2 controllers in the same Lan.

-ver.3.x to manage EAP330 on external site

-Ver.4.x to manage SDN Devices, actually only devices inside same Lan of the site can be managed

 

Goal is to to manage Externals SDN devices with the controller ver.4.x.

 

Can I move my port forward 29810 from IP controller V.3.x to the IP Controller V4.X ?

Does the Device will keep they adopted/connected  state on the v3.x controller ?

 

 

 

 

  0      
 
  0      
 
#1
Options
1 Accepted Solution
Re:May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?-Solution
2022-03-22 16:21:21 - last edited 2022-03-22 16:23:19

  @Hank21 

The easiest solution was to use

  • dual WAN from TL-ER7206
  • 2 controllers with statics IP into same VLAN 1 by default
  • NAT/virtual server corresponding ports controller#1 with WAN1 & ports controller#2 with WAN2 for remotes sites (both controllers see pending device if i connect a new one into the lan, just need to choose from wich one i start adoption procedure)

 

NO multi VLAN at all as the settings are much complicate to manage ports interfaces properties, especially if you mix another switch non tp-link or SDN compatible into your Lan.

 

I'm still facing many bugs from SDN and TL-ER7206, but i will open others threads for each of them.

Recommended Solution
  0  
  0  
#5
Options
4 Reply
Re:May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?
2022-03-01 08:02:41

  @Pascal Currently we can only use one Omada controller in one subnet. I will report your requirement to the related department. 

 

Temporary solution:

If possible, use your Router/switch to build a multi-nets network. Then you can put the two controllers in different VLAN network. 

Best Regards! >> Omada EAP Firmware Trial Available Here << >> Get the Latest Omada SDN Controller Releases Here << *Try filtering posts on each forum by Label of [Early Access]*
  0  
  0  
#2
Options
Re:May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?
2022-03-18 03:46:45

  @Hank21 

As there was no solution to create a second VLAN with my actual TL-ER6120 + TL-SG1016PE + TL-SG2008P

I ad purchased a second Router TL-ER7206 + TL-SG2428P

 

TL-ER6120 act as DHCP server for VLAN1 and NAT translate to controller 1 with Wan1 ip1 isp

TL-ER7206 Got VLAN1 interface without DHCP, VLAN2 with DHCP & VLAN3 with DHCP and Nat translate to controller 2 within VLAN3 WAN2 ip2 isp

 

All seems to working fine to access from outside the 2 controllers.

 

Now I'm pulling my airs to find a way to give communication between VLAN1,2 & 3.

despite the easy way for standalone switch & router configuration and try to replicate this with Omada SDN interface

I'm only able to communicate inside a same vlan between device.

It happened during my try to got  issue with infinite Adopting situation with the TL-ER7206 that forced me to reset to factory and rebuild the config.

 

Is there a nice explain from TP-Link to setup multi VLAN that can communicate with each other like this one but for SDN GUI ?: https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/887/

 

Also, in the latest update firmware TL-ER7206 i see: 10. In the Virtual Servers entry of the NAT module, support for adding multiple non-
consecutive ports

but i didn't found a way to add these non-consecutive ports into the port forwarding within the SDN controller...tried with 8043-8088 or 8043;8088 or 8043,8088

and 8043 8088

but none of these separators was admitted.

 

Cheers,

 

 

 

 

 

 

  0  
  0  
#3
Options
Re:May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?
2022-03-18 08:05:41 - last edited 2022-03-18 08:10:32

  @Pascal 

Hi, if you'd like use the latest Omada SDN, that would be great.

Per your request, you can refer to this link about Multi-SSID setup on Omada UI.

How to configure Multi-Networks & Multi-SSIDs on Omada SDN Controller

If you use the controller, it follows the format below. Virtual server is the port forwarding name in standalone mode. If you use Controller, look for the port forwarding under the Transmission.  

 

Best Regards! >> Omada EAP Firmware Trial Available Here << >> Get the Latest Omada SDN Controller Releases Here << *Try filtering posts on each forum by Label of [Early Access]*
  0  
  0  
#4
Options
Re:May I close the Port 29810 once the Devices are adopted ?-Solution
2022-03-22 16:21:21 - last edited 2022-03-22 16:23:19

  @Hank21 

The easiest solution was to use

  • dual WAN from TL-ER7206
  • 2 controllers with statics IP into same VLAN 1 by default
  • NAT/virtual server corresponding ports controller#1 with WAN1 & ports controller#2 with WAN2 for remotes sites (both controllers see pending device if i connect a new one into the lan, just need to choose from wich one i start adoption procedure)

 

NO multi VLAN at all as the settings are much complicate to manage ports interfaces properties, especially if you mix another switch non tp-link or SDN compatible into your Lan.

 

I'm still facing many bugs from SDN and TL-ER7206, but i will open others threads for each of them.

Recommended Solution
  0  
  0  
#5
Options

Information

Helpful: 0

Views: 569

Replies: 4

About Us
Press
Copyright © TP-Link Corporation Limited. All rights reserved.