Utilization EAP235
Utilization EAP235
When we replaced one of our old EAP 115-Wall with a new EAP235-wall I had to recognize, that the Omada 4.x doesn't show RX/TX-Frames and the Calculated Interference for the EAP235 as it did for the EAP 115.
This feature was never precise but anyway quite helpful to analyze if the channel is occupied by clients or other devices/foreign APs.
Will this behavior be back any time soon by firmwareupgrade or should we stay with an EAP225 to fix this?
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
thanks for the information, so the EAP 235 / 230 not usable for us.
It is a step backwards compared to the EAP 225.
Best Regards
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear @fishbone222,
fishbone222 wrote
When we replaced one of our old EAP 115-Wall with a new EAP235-wall I had to recognize, that the Omada 4.x doesn't show RX/TX-Frames and the Calculated Interference for the EAP235 as it did for the EAP 115.
I haven't met this before, are there 5G clients near the AP? Would it help if you forget the AP and re-adopt it? I assume your EAP may not report the information back to the controller for some reason.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for your reply, and sorry for my delayed reply.
There are 5 and 2.4 GHz clients in rage of the EAP235 and sometimes also some quite close to it.
I readopted it. Still just the total utilization at 2.4G no rx/tx. With fewer clients than usual.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
i have the same problem. I think it`s a firmware bug.
The last update to V1_3.0.0 did not bring any improvement.
5 GHZ EU Channels ar also not adjustable.
Best Regards
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for your reply and the information, that we are not the only once facing this problem.
On 5G all our accesspoints (EAP245, EAP225, EAP225-Wall, EAP235-wall) just accept 36 to 48 in Omada.
Therefore I don't think this is related to this issue.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
As we don't mandatory need the 3 rj45-plugs we gave a try also to the eap230-wall which has the same behavior.
I suppose the 3.0 Firmware which both AP's have in common has a general problem.
Furthermore we recognized, that the eap230 and the eap235 both have a quite high rx-drop-rate counted.
That's not like it on the other AP's even if we exchange them in their position and channel-setting.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
EAP 235 & 230 have "Banana" Firmware, matures at the Customer .
Best Regards
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
It looks like, so we gonna replace them with EAP225 for now.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear @fishbone222,
fishbone222 wrote
As we don't mandatory need the 3 rj45-plugs we gave a try also to the eap230-wall which has the same behavior.
I suppose the 3.0 Firmware which both AP's have in common has a general problem.
Furthermore we recognized, that the eap230 and the eap235 both have a quite high rx-drop-rate counted.
That's not like it on the other AP's even if we exchange them in their position and channel-setting.
I tested with one EAP235-Wall but haven't encountered the issue you mentioned above.
To better assist you, I'd like to escalate your case to the TP-Link support team who could help you more efficiently.
They will reach you via your registered email address shortly, please pay attention to your email box later.
Once the issue is addressed or resolved, I'd encourage you to share it with the community.
Thank you so much for your cooperation and support!
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
is there any new information about the problem ?
Best Regards
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 3272
Replies: 18
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.