Distance between Root AP and Mesh AP - Signalstrength
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Hi are there any recommendations for the distance between two APs in a mesh system based on their signal strength ?
What would be the minimum signal strength of the Root AP at the position of the mesh AP to have a quality connection between both? -65dbm or less ? Or how strong should be the signal at the overlapping point? -50dbm to allow a good data transfer?
Are there any planing tools available?
I just got a Eap225-Outdoor for testing and I am trying to figure out how many I need.
Thanks for your help.
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Lens, a RSSI of -50dBm (100%) is unrealistic for larger distances.
Let -50dBm (and higher) equal to 100% signal quality and -100dBm equal to 0% signal quality, then you would need at least 45% signal quality for a reliable link, albeit with 35-40% quality some services with small bandwidth requirements still could work.
The commonly used formula is: signal quality in percent = 2 × ((RSSI in dBm) + 100)
This is what you can expect:
-50dBm (100% signal quality) would be »Very good«, but can be achieved over very short distances only.
-69dBm (62% signal quality) would still be »Very good«.
-70dBm is »Okay« (60% signal quality), it's the minimum RSSI value which ensures reliable packet delivery.
-80dBm is »Not good« (40% signal quality), packet loss can appear.
-90dBm is »Unusable« (20% signal quality), approaching or drowning the noise floor.
So, with -61dBm RSSI you have a signal quality of 78%. That's pretty good for reliable data transmissions.
BTW: You also need to take SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) into account. Quality for data transmissions depends on SNR, not the RSSI alone.
SNR is calculated as follows: SNR in dB = RSSI in dBm − Noise Level in dBm
So, with a RSSI of -61dBm and a noise level of -98dBm the SNR is 37dB, which is pretty good.
For reliable data transfers you need a SNR of 25dB or better.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Lens wrote
Hi are there any recommendations for the distance between two APs in a mesh system based on their signal strength ?
What would be the minimum signal strength of the Root AP at the position of the mesh AP to have a quality connection between both? -65dbm or less ? Or how strong should be the signal at the overlapping point? -50dbm to allow a good data transfer?
Are there any planing tools available?
I just got a Eap225-Outdoor for testing and I am trying to figure out how many I need.
Thanks for your help.
According to the test result, the recommended distance between root AP and mesh AP is less than 180 meters.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@jonas thanks. Is there no recommendation with the signal strength? I measured the eap225-outdoor performance and at about 25m signal drops to about -61dbm. So if I put the second eap at 50m of each other, the signal overlap would be around -60dbm. Is that good enough for a speedy data transmission between the two eaps or do I need an overlap of -55dbm for example.
Thanks Lens.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Lens, a RSSI of -50dBm (100%) is unrealistic for larger distances.
Let -50dBm (and higher) equal to 100% signal quality and -100dBm equal to 0% signal quality, then you would need at least 45% signal quality for a reliable link, albeit with 35-40% quality some services with small bandwidth requirements still could work.
The commonly used formula is: signal quality in percent = 2 × ((RSSI in dBm) + 100)
This is what you can expect:
-50dBm (100% signal quality) would be »Very good«, but can be achieved over very short distances only.
-69dBm (62% signal quality) would still be »Very good«.
-70dBm is »Okay« (60% signal quality), it's the minimum RSSI value which ensures reliable packet delivery.
-80dBm is »Not good« (40% signal quality), packet loss can appear.
-90dBm is »Unusable« (20% signal quality), approaching or drowning the noise floor.
So, with -61dBm RSSI you have a signal quality of 78%. That's pretty good for reliable data transmissions.
BTW: You also need to take SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) into account. Quality for data transmissions depends on SNR, not the RSSI alone.
SNR is calculated as follows: SNR in dB = RSSI in dBm − Noise Level in dBm
So, with a RSSI of -61dBm and a noise level of -98dBm the SNR is 37dB, which is pretty good.
For reliable data transfers you need a SNR of 25dB or better.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks that helped me a lot. I only have to cover about 40m around a C-shaped building so I will put one Eap on every end of the C so I should be well covered in the center of the C and also around the corners. Tried the one eap I have in the center of the building but the signal is not that good around the corners then.
One question about the signal quality. Netspot indicates a quality of 59% with -41dbm and -92dbm of noise, is it the same quality you are talking about?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Lens wrote
One question about the signal quality. Netspot indicates a quality of 59% with -41dbm and -92dbm of noise, is it the same quality you are talking about?
I don't see »Signal Quality« (sometimes called »CCQ« = »Client Connect Quality«) in NetSpot. NetSpot reports »Signal Strength« as a percentage (where -100dBm = 0% and -0dBm = 100%) and also »Noise Level« as a percentage. This means a 100% signal quality can never be reached as well as a 50% noise level is almost unlikely to appear in reality.
NetSpot indeed knows about the common formula for computing »Signal Quality/CCQ«, but their analyzer software doesn't display this value.
See their post about RSSI mentioning the SQ/CCQ formula: https://www.netspotapp.com/what-is-rssi-level.html
In my opinion the NetSpot statistics should better show SQ/CCQ rather than »Signal Strengh« as a percentage.
At least they show the SNR as a colored bar under »Level«, which gives a good overview of quality, too.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 3154
Replies: 5
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.