WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
Posts: 7
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-01-03
2016-01-03 23:51:16
Posts: 7
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-01-03
WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-03 23:51:16
Tags:
Model :
Hardware Version : Not Clear
Firmware Version :
ISP :
Hello there.
If I log in to the WA901ND admin page it shows me at the bottom of the page the System Up Time like 22 days 18:24:57 what corrosponds with the systems logfile and is the real uptime of the system.
If I do an SNMP get to OID .iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.system.sysUpTime (.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3) I get as response 367 days, 15 hours, 46 minutes, 57 seconds...
root@SR09P1:~# snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (3176588791) 367 days, 15:51:27.91
Hardware Version : Not Clear
Firmware Version :
ISP :
Hello there.
If I log in to the WA901ND admin page it shows me at the bottom of the page the System Up Time like 22 days 18:24:57 what corrosponds with the systems logfile and is the real uptime of the system.
If I do an SNMP get to OID .iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.system.sysUpTime (.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3) I get as response 367 days, 15 hours, 46 minutes, 57 seconds...
root@SR09P1:~# snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (3176588791) 367 days, 15:51:27.91
| Is there a different unterstanding of the OID or an other OID to read the correct sysUpTime? Thanks in advance Stefan |
#1
Options
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
12 Reply
Posts: 227
Helpful: 3
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-08-31
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-04 11:49:14
SysUpTime in TL-WA901ND is the running time since the device is powered.
While using SNMP it means the SNMP Agent's running time, in another word, the monitoring time.
While using SNMP it means the SNMP Agent's running time, in another word, the monitoring time.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#2
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 7
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-01-03
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-05 03:17:31
So far so good. The funny thing is that the last power off was 22 days ago ... and I'm shure, the SNMP agent was down too at this moment ;)
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#3
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 227
Helpful: 3
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-08-31
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-05 09:09:17
Can you reboot the device and obtain again of the SysUpTime via SNMP to see if the value is still fabulous?
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#4
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 7
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-01-03
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-05 18:24:44
Indeed, they are. I've powerd down the device again and have monitored the sysUpTime while the devices was comming up again:
root@SR09P1:~#
root@SR09P1:~# while [ 1 ] ; do date; echo $cmd; $cmd; echo ""; sleep 1; done
Tue Jan 5 10:12:11 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
Timeout: No Response from 192.168.6.250.
...
Tue Jan 5 10:12:46 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (97) 0:00:00.97
Tue Jan 5 10:12:49 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (200) 0:00:02.00
Tue Jan 5 10:12:50 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (303) 0:00:03.03
...
Tue Jan 5 10:13:35 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (4770) 0:00:47.70
Tue Jan 5 10:13:36 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (3191887182) 369 days, 10:21:11.82
Tue Jan 5 10:13:37 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (3191887286) 369 days, 10:21:12.86
Tue Jan 5 10:13:38 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (3191887390) 369 days, 10:21:13.90
^C
root@SR09P1:~#
As you can see in the log above the sysUpTime starts correctly and changes to an invalid value after 47 seconds. This behavior looks like a bug to me.
By the way the device is
root@SR09P1:~#
root@SR09P1:~# while [ 1 ] ; do date; echo $cmd; $cmd; echo ""; sleep 1; done
Tue Jan 5 10:12:11 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
Timeout: No Response from 192.168.6.250.
...
Tue Jan 5 10:12:46 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (97) 0:00:00.97
Tue Jan 5 10:12:49 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (200) 0:00:02.00
Tue Jan 5 10:12:50 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (303) 0:00:03.03
...
Tue Jan 5 10:13:35 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (4770) 0:00:47.70
Tue Jan 5 10:13:36 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (3191887182) 369 days, 10:21:11.82
Tue Jan 5 10:13:37 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (3191887286) 369 days, 10:21:12.86
Tue Jan 5 10:13:38 GMT 2016
snmpget -v 2c -c public 192.168.6.250 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (3191887390) 369 days, 10:21:13.90
^C
root@SR09P1:~#
As you can see in the log above the sysUpTime starts correctly and changes to an invalid value after 47 seconds. This behavior looks like a bug to me.
By the way the device is
| Firmware Version: |
3.16.9 Build 150409 Rel.60640n |
| Hardware Version: |
WA901ND v3 00000000 |
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#5
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 16
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2014-07-01
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-06 17:49:00
It is not the only bug in the 901ND Access Point. Even the emailing of the syslog does not work at all.
If someone has managed to email the syslog, please ... show up and ... provide evidence!!!
If someone has managed to email the syslog, please ... show up and ... provide evidence!!!
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#6
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 227
Helpful: 3
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-08-31
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-07 10:03:57
torque wrote
As you can see in the log above the sysUpTime starts correctly and changes to an invalid value after 47 seconds. This behavior looks like a bug to me.
By the way the device is
Firmware Version: 3.16.9 Build 150409 Rel.60640n Hardware Version: WA901ND v3 00000000
I borrow a 901V3 and do the test but didn't meet your situation. I use MIB Broswer with SNMPv2C as yours. You can see the below log that when in 1min the time is still correct:
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50941 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:32s.96th (9296)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50943 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:34s.77th (9477)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50945 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:36s.10th (9610)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50947 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:37s.27th (9727)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50949 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:38s.96th (9896)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50951 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:40s.26th (10026)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50953 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:41s.12th (10112)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50955 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:41s.99th (10199)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50957 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:42s.83th (10283)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50959 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:43s.74th (10374)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50961 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:44s.93th (10493)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 50963 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:45s.79th (10579)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 49295 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:46s.71th (10671)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 49297 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:47s.64th (10764)
Remote address: 192.168.0.254 port: 161 transport: IP/UDP
Local address: 192.168.0.11 port: 49299 transport: IP/UDP
Protocol version: SNMPv2c
1: sysUpTimeInstance (timeticks) 0 days 00h:01m:48s.79th (10879)
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#7
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 227
Helpful: 3
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2015-08-31
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-07 10:07:40
aster1x wrote
It is not the only bug in the 901ND Access Point. Even the emailing of the syslog does not work at all.
If someone has managed to email the syslog, please ... show up and ... provide evidence!!!
Would you please share us with your syslog? I've try this function on my 901ND V4 and it works. The below you should pay attention:
1. Username/Password of the E-Mail should be correct. Double check.
2. The device should be able to access internet.
3. Gateway is needed to setup.
4. Which E-Mail do you use? This function doesn't support SSL/TLS encryption mailbox.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#8
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 7
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-01-03
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-14 04:10:44
Sending syslog via email works fine on my device. The destination is a local account in my network and every day at scheduled time the logfile is mailed. Every logitem has a correct timestamp.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#9
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 16
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2014-07-01
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-14 17:57:07
@stupidbird
Can you suggest a public email provider who does not require somekind of mailbox encryption? Gmail for one, requires TLS encryption.
Can you suggest a public email provider who does not require somekind of mailbox encryption? Gmail for one, requires TLS encryption.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#10
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 16
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2014-07-01
Re:WA901ND v3: Invalid sysUpTime
2016-01-14 17:58:26
@ torque
Which email provider do you use to send the email for the syslog?
Also which hardware version and which firmware version do you have?
Which email provider do you use to send the email for the syslog?
Also which hardware version and which firmware version do you have?
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#11
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 7
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-01-03
2016-01-03 23:51:16
Posts: 7
Helpful: 0
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-01-03
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 1638
Replies: 12
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.
Tags
Related Articles
Invalid password
638
0
Report Inappropriate Content
Transfer Module
New message