@Fae 

It looks like I started this thread about 8 months ago.  I recently upgraded all my firmware (EAP620HD v1 to firmware v1.0.4) and controller (v4.4.4) and I see that I still only have channels 36, 40, 44, and 48 available in the 5GHz band; e.g., DFS has not been added.  I understood from you that this would have been added in Q2.

 

Could you please clarify what the issues are and what I can expect going forward?  My older, cheaper APs all supported DFS which is becoming more and more important as the 5GHz band is filling up in busy areas.  (where I live)  This forces me to overlap my AP channels since I have only 1 effective 5GHz 80MHz BW channel.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

@symbiotic_ic 

 

You can download a beta, link in his post.

https://community.tp-link.com/en/business/forum/topic/267736

 

But no official release yet, one year after  .. very disappointing.

@shberge 

 

Thanks for the link. We have the EAP620 and you are refering to the beta firmware EAP660. Will it work also ?

 

Regards

 

Sam

@SamuelVenker 

There is a EAP620 link in this post to

 

https://static.tp-link.com/upload/beta/2021/202108/20210820/EAP620HD_v1_1.0.6_Build%2020210730.zip

Thanks ! I found it too. Do you know if it is comptabile with the EU model ? Should be but prefer asking...

@SamuelVenker 

 

I use both firmware on EU modells.

 

 

@shberge 

Thank you for the link.  I'm not sure if I have the time to debug a beta firmware, but it's at least a good sign it's being worked on.  I have EAP620HD v1, do you happen to know if the beta firmware applies to v1 or v2?  (I'm not sure if they are compatible)  I'm also EU.

 

@Fae, in a previous post you said that for EAP620HD v2, Controller v5, DFS channels would be supported.  I have the EAP620HD v1; is it also the case that it will support DFS channels with Controller v5?  When is that expected?

 

@symbiotic_ic 

 

This firmware is for V1 device, I have used it for a while and have not any problem so far.

 

but its easy to roll back if you have any trouble. but I think that not will be necessary 

@shberge 

Thank you very much!