ER8411 V1 1.4.0 Build 20260603 Rel Pre-Release Firmware (Release on June 5th, 2026)

ER8411 V1 1.4.0 Build 20260603 Rel Pre-Release Firmware (Release on June 5th, 2026)

17 Reply
Re:ER8411 V1 1.4.0 Build 20260603 Rel Pre-Release Firmware (Release on June 5th, 2026)
3 weeks ago

  @Vincent-TP Thanks! Updated one site, i.e., replaced the fixed 1.3.6. release date December 2025.

Until now, no problems spotted. All connections went up again immediately, also the VPN link to second site.Will review further next week.

Speed test (DSL 250) shows good values.

SW controller 6.2.10.17.

Br's

  1  
1
#13
Options
Re:ER8411 V1 1.4.0 Build 20260603 Rel Pre-Release Firmware (Release on June 5th, 2026)
2 weeks ago

  @Vincent-TP 

 

Success !!! update firmware FW - 1.40 on ER8411 V1, two wan operational, first on SFP+ Cable Internet 1gig, second, on SFP T-Mobile Home Internet ~500mb, both running good, connected to Switch SG3218XP-M2 via SFP+ on both ends, speed test on ER8411 showing correct values, no overheat, no reboots, CPU and Memory on normal readings, as for now.  Happy Camper here.

 

Thanks Vincent,

 

Matrox00612

Setup:

1- OC220 - V1 - FW. 1.5.11 -8

1- ER8411 - V1 - FW1.40

1- SG3218XP-M2 - V1 - FW1.0.26

2- SG2210XMP - M2 - FWV1 - 1.0.26

2- EAP787- V1 - FW1.5.2 

  1  
1
#14
Options
Re:ER8411 V1 1.4.0 Build 20260603 Rel Pre-Release Firmware (Release on June 5th, 2026)
2 weeks ago

Hi  @MantonL 

 

Thank you for all the info.

We have been unable to reproduce this issue in our local tests. Speedtest results can be affected by various factors, and since our laboratory test environment is relatively ideal, it may differ from your actual usage scenario. To further pinpoint the problem, I have created a ticket to collect more info; the case ID is TKID260615693. Please kindly check your email inbox and reply to us.

MantonL wrote

  @Vincent-TP Hi Vincent, I’ve just upgraded a 3rd site that only has a 1gb connection and that is reporting the download accurately, so it appears to be an issue only with faster than 1gb WAN connections

 

Many Thanks Lee...

 

  0  
0
#15
Options
Re:ER8411 V1 1.4.0 Build 20260603 Rel Pre-Release Firmware (Release on June 5th, 2026)
2 weeks ago - last edited 2 weeks ago

  @Vincent-TP 

 

Add support for showing a list of clients obtaining IP addresses via DHCP when adopted on the controller.

 

Hello Vincent,

Does this helps or fixes the issue regarding client IP in controller that are connected to ES switches ? 

Thank you !

 

EDIT: I've seen that I can se devices IPs on each LAN network (even from ES switches), but still not under controller clients list. I really hope this can be fixed now, is just copy-paste information

  0  
0
#16
Options
Re:ER8411 V1 1.4.0 Build 20260603 Rel Pre-Release Firmware (Release on June 5th, 2026)
2 weeks ago

Hi  @268BBA 

 

Thanks for your feedback.

Due to hardware limitations, we cannot directly display the ES switch’s devices in the controller's client list.

The current design (which shows them in the DHCP list on the Omada gateway) is actually our intended approach. Thanks for your understanding.

 

268BBA wrote

  @Vincent-TP 

 

Add support for showing a list of clients obtaining IP addresses via DHCP when adopted on the controller.

 

Hello Vincent,

Does this helps or fixes the issue regarding client IP in controller that are connected to ES switches ? 

Thank you !

 

EDIT: I've seen that I can se devices IPs on each LAN network (even from ES switches), but still not under controller clients list. I really hope this can be fixed now, is just copy-paste information

 

  0  
0
#17
Options
Re:ER8411 V1 1.4.0 Build 20260603 Rel Pre-Release Firmware (Release on June 5th, 2026)
a week ago

  @Vincent-TP 

Find Add Support Wireguard VPN Server Add show QR Code. Love it~~

  3  
3
#18
Options
Re:ER8411 V1 1.4.0 Build 20260603 Rel Pre-Release Firmware (Release on June 5th, 2026)
a week ago

Is there a chance that you could look into the MBIM included in the devices OpenWRT?

 

The MBIM support is enabled but some of the network scripts are incomplete.

The USB-Modem performance would be much better if MBIM or even better QMI would work correctly.

 

  0  
0
#19
Options