The best coverage at the expense of the rest

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.

The best coverage at the expense of the rest

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
The best coverage at the expense of the rest
The best coverage at the expense of the rest
2024-04-22 07:12:48
Model: RE650  
Hardware Version:
Firmware Version:

Hello, I am asking for advice on which wireless WiFi signal extender to choose, I care about range, not quality or speed. RE650 or Archer C54 or?

 

  1      
  1      
#1
Options
4 Reply
Re:The best coverage at the expense of the rest
2024-04-22 07:43:52

  @SylwjJ 

 

If I don't care about the speed I would bet on Archer C54.

If this was helpful click on the arrow pointing upward to make it blue. If this solves your issue, click the star to make it blue and mark the post as a "Recommended Solution".
  2  
  2  
#2
Options
Re:The best coverage at the expense of the rest
2024-04-22 08:56:35
Thank you for help. Or maybe you can suggest something else to extend wireless wifi to my garage? But wireless dont need to be fast, I need ito to wall box charger and 2 wifi cameras.
  0  
  0  
#3
Options
Re:The best coverage at the expense of the rest
2024-06-15 12:04:49

  @terziyski c54 & c64 seems similar except for gigabit ports on c64

  0  
  0  
#4
Options
Re:The best coverage at the expense of the rest
2024-06-16 13:08:46

  @sunil012 

 

The Archer C54 supports true Range Extender Mode, while the Archer C64 does not!


(I know the C64 does support WDS, but this requires a main router that also supports WDS, which makes it trial and error)

 

  0  
  0  
#5
Options