Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
I would be interested to know if most are using Docker or actually the OC. Because docker is not officially supported.
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
OC200 was my choice
Just because it worked out just £10 more expensive vs building this on a Pi or Docker setup, just the easier / quicker option.. it also looks a bit more professional when sitting in the rack
The OC300 is totally overkill unless you are doing a massive setup with hundreds of APs.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Official Linux controller (no docker used).
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Matt Bentley's docker image, on Ubuntu, in Proxmox. I prefer software for easy backup/recovery/failover.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
OC200 - Site 1
Docker/Synology NAS - Site 2 (using mbentley's docker image with 'host' networking).
The OC200 is the easier of the two, often I cannot connect locally to the docker image and have to login via the cloudconnect option...but it's probably something k1nky with my local network config...and I haven't had time or the interest to debug it. However both work and do what they are supposed to.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
d0ugmac1 wrote
OC200 - Site 1
Docker/Synology NAS - Site 2 (using mbentley's docker image with 'host' networking).
The OC200 is the easier of the two, often I cannot connect locally to the docker image and have to login via the cloudconnect option...but it's probably something k1nky with my local network config...and I haven't had time or the interest to debug it. However both work and do what they are supposed to.
Same here.... OC200 for No.1 Site & a Docker /QNAP NAS running container station. QNAP perfectly stable with local & cloud log-in.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
OC200 to have a embedded/turn key solution.
you loose a bit of long term logging but my setup is only SOHO.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
I use a Ubuntu VM (vmware) so I can take backup/snap shots of it.
The reason I went that route is I bought an OC200 and rebooted it. It took a while to come back. It seemed slow. I wanted a faster response time and (again) backup options.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm also running mbentley's docker on an unRAID server (so running a lot of other things too!). It's been faultless, reliable and updated very quickly when new releases are out. It's very responsive too.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 2
Views: 2470
Replies: 9
Voters 1
