Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.

Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-09-26 14:25:49 - last edited 2022-10-28 01:07:13
Hardware Version: V5
Firmware Version:

I would be interested to know if most are using Docker or actually the OC. Because docker is not officially supported.

  3      
  3      
#1
Options
9 Reply
Re:Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-09-26 16:21:27 - last edited 2022-09-26 16:22:33

  @Godanet 

 

OC200 was my choice

 

Just because it worked out just £10 more expensive  vs building this on a Pi or Docker setup, just the easier / quicker option..  it also looks a bit more professional when sitting in the rack

 

The OC300 is totally overkill unless you are doing a massive setup with hundreds of APs.

 

 

  0  
  0  
#2
Options
Re:Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-09-26 18:41:04

Official Linux controller (no docker used).

  2  
  2  
#3
Options
Re:Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-09-26 23:07:24

  @Godanet,

 

Matt Bentley's docker image, on Ubuntu, in Proxmox. I prefer software for easy backup/recovery/failover.

  1  
  1  
#4
Options
Re:Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-09-27 17:28:32

  @Godanet 

 

OC200 - Site 1

Docker/Synology NAS -  Site 2  (using mbentley's docker image with 'host' networking).

 

The OC200 is the easier of the two, often I cannot connect locally to the docker image and have to login via the cloudconnect option...but it's probably something k1nky with my local network config...and I haven't had time or the interest to debug it.  However both work and do what they are supposed to.

 

  0  
  0  
#6
Options
Re:Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-09-28 16:21:35

d0ugmac1 wrote

  @Godanet 

 

OC200 - Site 1

Docker/Synology NAS -  Site 2  (using mbentley's docker image with 'host' networking).

 

The OC200 is the easier of the two, often I cannot connect locally to the docker image and have to login via the cloudconnect option...but it's probably something k1nky with my local network config...and I haven't had time or the interest to debug it.  However both work and do what they are supposed to.

 

  @d0ugmac1 

Same here.... OC200 for No.1 Site & a Docker /QNAP NAS running container station.  QNAP perfectly stable with local & cloud log-in.

 

 

  0  
  0  
#7
Options
Re:Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-09-28 18:19:57

  @Godanet 

 

OC200 to have a embedded/turn key solution. 

you loose a bit of long term logging but my setup is only SOHO. 

  0  
  0  
#8
Options
Re:Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-09-29 14:57:36

  @Godanet 

 

I use a Ubuntu VM (vmware) so I can take backup/snap shots of it.

 

The reason I went that route is I bought an OC200 and rebooted it.  It took a while to come back.  It seemed slow.  I wanted a faster response time and (again) backup options.  

 

 

I can not teach anyone anything - I can only make them think
  1  
  1  
#9
Options
Re:Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-09-30 13:45:42

  @Godanet 

 

I'm also running mbentley's docker on an unRAID server (so running a lot of other things too!). It's been faultless, reliable and updated very quickly when new releases are out. It's very responsive too.

 

 

 

 

  1  
  1  
#10
Options
Re:Do you use the OC 200, 300 or docker
2022-10-04 12:11:37
My container on Docker is always accessible both locally and online. The only thing I have here is partial FAlschmeldungen the APP that Omada is offline
  0  
  0  
#12
Options

Information

Helpful: 3

Views: 863

Replies: 9

Related Articles