ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.

ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
58 Reply
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-11-29 11:31:58

  @Clive_A 

 

Are the Ipv6 LAN prefixes other than 0 supported in this release? I see this not working in 2.2.2

 

Lets say,

 

WAN:

If I enable IPV6 in WAN and select Dynamic IP (SLAAC + DHCPV6) via DHCPV6 -> Enable Prefix Delegation -> Size of 64

 

LAN:

In LAN -> WLAN -> Enable V6 -> IPV6 Prefix ID = 0 ---> All works well. Tested by --> tracert -6 google.com   ---> I get the expected result. Also the ipv6 test website says i got V6 assigned and same with google V6 test website. All good.

 

But,

 

WAN:

If i select Prefix Delegation -> Size of 59

 

LAN:

IPV6 Prefix ID = 5 (within in the range of 1-31) -> I see IPV6 prefix is assigned -> However IPv6 routes to WAN are broken. Meaning ---> tracert -6 google.com completely fails. Here the IPV6 test, google V6 test website fails

 

Why is this?

  0  
  0  
#46
Options
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-11-30 01:51:34 - last edited 2023-11-30 01:57:19

Hi @vnan1829 

Thanks for posting in our business forum.

vnan1829 wrote

  @Clive_A 

 

Are the Ipv6 LAN prefixes other than 0 supported in this release? I see this not working in 2.2.2

 

Lets say,

 

WAN:

If I enable IPV6 in WAN and select Dynamic IP (SLAAC + DHCPV6) via DHCPV6 -> Enable Prefix Delegation -> Size of 64

 

LAN:

In LAN -> WLAN -> Enable V6 -> IPV6 Prefix ID = 0 ---> All works well. Tested by --> tracert -6 google.com   ---> I get the expected result. Also the ipv6 test website says i got V6 assigned and same with google V6 test website. All good.

 

But,

 

WAN:

If i select Prefix Delegation -> Size of 59

 

LAN:

IPV6 Prefix ID = 5 (within in the range of 1-31) -> I see IPV6 prefix is assigned -> However IPv6 routes to WAN are broken. Meaning ---> tracert -6 google.com completely fails. Here the IPV6 test, google V6 test website fails

 

Why is this?

Give me the screenshots of your config for the second setup. WAN, LAN, and tracert result. Partially mosaic your sensitive information.

 

Is your ISP allowing you to use PD 59? Is PD 64 your ISP told you?

Best Regards! If you are new to the forum, please read: Howto - A Guide to Use Forum Effectively. Read Before You Post. Look for a model? Search your model NOW Official and Beta firmware. NEW features! Subscribe for the latest update!Download Beta Here☚ ☛ ★ Configuration Guide ★ ☚ ☛ ★ Knowledge Base ★ ☚ ☛ ★ Troubleshooting ★ ☚ ● Be kind and nice. ● Stay on the topic. ● Post details. ● Search first. ● Please don't take it for granted. ● No email confidentiality should be violated. ● S/N, MAC, and your true public IP should be mosaiced.
  0  
  0  
#47
Options
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-12-01 20:01:41 - last edited 2023-12-03 10:49:25

  @Clive_A 

 

Thank you for the response. I have figured this out by discussing with my ISP. They support only 56, 64 Prefix Size. So after reconfiguring it, now it works. So, this is no longer an issue.

  1  
  1  
#48
Options
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-12-08 23:40:26

  @Clive_A 

 

why is this release called ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware, released on 10.24

 

and the official release ER605 V2_2.2.2 Build 20231017 Official Firmware (Released on Oct 18th, 2023), before the beta above.

 

If a beta is released after an official release, should it not be that same version or higher? i.e. V2_2.1.5 BETA should be called V2_2.2.3 BETA instead?

 

If find TP Link's naming convention hugely confusing as to features and bugs as they relate to official releases. 

To me it looks more like this firmware is forked into 2 paths (is this normal), rather than take a logical "release", then "beta", then the next release will have the bugs o the beta resolved, etc, etc.

 

There was a comment you made in another post "don't use the official 2.2.2 release, instead beta 2.1.4"... 

 

Thanks,

  1  
  1  
#49
Options
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-12-09 07:16:31

Hello,

 

Anyone has any idea if ER605 V2 will have DPI as in the latest Omada Controller Release 5.13.22? As of now, when I go to the DPI section I get the message: Gateway does not support DPI.

Current Setup: 1x ER605 v2.0, 1x TL-SG3428X v1.0, 2x TL-SG3210 v3.0, 1x TL-SG2210MP v1.0, 2x EAP670(EU) v1.0
  0  
  0  
#50
Options
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-12-10 11:34:20

  @Adandu 

 

Hardware capacity?

  0  
  0  
#51
Options
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-12-10 11:42:39

  @Educamlei 

What do you mean by that? If you mean the controller? Well, the controller is in a Docker Container (mbentley), I do not have a HW Controller like the OC200 or OC300.

Current Setup: 1x ER605 v2.0, 1x TL-SG3428X v1.0, 2x TL-SG3210 v3.0, 1x TL-SG2210MP v1.0, 2x EAP670(EU) v1.0
  0  
  0  
#52
Options
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-12-11 01:30:06

Hi @Adandu 

Thanks for posting in our business forum.

Adandu wrote

  @Educamlei 

What do you mean by that? If you mean the controller? Well, the controller is in a Docker Container (mbentley), I do not have a HW Controller like the OC200 or OC300.

He means that the hardware capacity of the ER605 might not support DPI. So the very first model is ER7206, added with DPI. Then other flagship models. I am not sure that DPI will be implemented in the ER605. If the hardware allows this, it should stay consistent like the other models to have the DPI.

Please wait for the future firmware update.

Best Regards! If you are new to the forum, please read: Howto - A Guide to Use Forum Effectively. Read Before You Post. Look for a model? Search your model NOW Official and Beta firmware. NEW features! Subscribe for the latest update!Download Beta Here☚ ☛ ★ Configuration Guide ★ ☚ ☛ ★ Knowledge Base ★ ☚ ☛ ★ Troubleshooting ★ ☚ ● Be kind and nice. ● Stay on the topic. ● Post details. ● Search first. ● Please don't take it for granted. ● No email confidentiality should be violated. ● S/N, MAC, and your true public IP should be mosaiced.
  0  
  0  
#53
Options
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-12-11 01:33:36

Hi @words 

Thanks for posting in our business forum.

words wrote

  @Clive_A 

 

why is this release called ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware, released on 10.24

 

and the official release ER605 V2_2.2.2 Build 20231017 Official Firmware (Released on Oct 18th, 2023), before the beta above.

 

If a beta is released after an official release, should it not be that same version or higher? i.e. V2_2.1.5 BETA should be called V2_2.2.3 BETA instead?

 

If find TP Link's naming convention hugely confusing as to features and bugs as they relate to official releases. 

To me it looks more like this firmware is forked into 2 paths (is this normal), rather than take a logical "release", then "beta", then the next release will have the bugs o the beta resolved, etc, etc.

 

There was a comment you made in another post "don't use the official 2.2.2 release, instead beta 2.1.4"... 

 

Thanks,

2.1.4 is the one on track. 2.2.2 is a specially made one for security reasons. That's why I made the comment.

So, I don't think you should be worried about the version thing. It does not affect anything. Both firmware can be considered okay to use. But if you wanna stay on the track, use the 2.1.5.

Best Regards! If you are new to the forum, please read: Howto - A Guide to Use Forum Effectively. Read Before You Post. Look for a model? Search your model NOW Official and Beta firmware. NEW features! Subscribe for the latest update!Download Beta Here☚ ☛ ★ Configuration Guide ★ ☚ ☛ ★ Knowledge Base ★ ☚ ☛ ★ Troubleshooting ★ ☚ ● Be kind and nice. ● Stay on the topic. ● Post details. ● Search first. ● Please don't take it for granted. ● No email confidentiality should be violated. ● S/N, MAC, and your true public IP should be mosaiced.
  0  
  0  
#54
Options
Re:ER605 V2_2.1.5 Build 20231024 Beta Firmware for Omada Controller V5.11 (Released on Oct 26th, 2023)
2023-12-14 11:52:19

  @Clive_A 

This Beta version is working well on both IP4 and IP6

However, the test site https://ipv6-test.com/ tells me that ICMPv6 packets are being filtered by the firewall on my ER605. I have created no additional ACL rules for IPv6 so this must be the default rule.

As you may know, ICMPv6 is described as an important part of of IPv6 and this RFC suggests ICMPv6 packets should be allowed through 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4890

 

I have tried to create a specific IPv6 ACL rule to allow IPv6 ICMP to work as required but can't see how.

 

Please advise on TP-Link's advice as to what ICMPv6 rules should be created and how this can be achieved in this Beta version

Alternatively, assuming your developers are well aware of the relevant RFCs, should the default IPv6 Defaults coded into the Firmware be amended?

 

Thanks

mhoam

 

 

  0  
  0  
#55
Options