EasyMesh backhaul connection vs Guest and IoT wifi networks
EasyMesh backhaul connection vs Guest and IoT wifi networks

Hi,
is there a way to configure Easymesh with two C64 routers to work with Guest and IoT wifi as well as with main wifi? Main wifi seems to work with EasyMesh backhaul just fine but rest of network are not extended.
Thanks for reply
Kind regards
Lukas
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is totally unacceptable. The EasyMesh specs support this and customers have no reason to suspect this is not implemented. If I'd know TP-Link products don't support this I'd never buy them. And now I probably never will.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Sunshine Any info on this development, given that it's now been 15 months? This issue is irking many, many of your customers and a quick search of this issue online on various platforms is driving many of your customers away -- myself included soon if this isn't sorted. Can you please clarify when we can expect an update to enable IoT and Guest networks on EasyMesh?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Sunshine any update now? I bought the same router (BE400) in 3er pack and need the guest network and IoT network work on the entire coverage.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
nicke011 wrote
Almost 2025 now, I really hope this feature will be added soon, as it sounds like it's only a software limitation. I bought two Archer AX53 routers in hope I will be able to connect them via ethernet backhaul and it would allow me to extend my network fully on two ends of my house. Quite a dissappointment it only works for main WiFi, and does not support IoT and Guest Networks. I use both in my home, and I ended up setting both routers as main routers with their own networks... Sad
@nicke011 "Soon", I don't know how you define "soon" but it was requested over a year ago and there has been no indication this is being worked on at all.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content

Information
Helpful: 3
Views: 3609
Replies: 14
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.