@Jimsx03 The difference is simple, the lower AP does not break out the 'BUSY' information like the upper one does. In other words RX+TX+INTERFERENCE == BUSY Also the difference between 30% and 40%...

@Selwynas As above you need a negotiated (802.3af/at) 48-53V POE injector, NOT a passive 24V/48V one. The POE solution will use all 4 pairs in your Ethernet cable so you want to be sure it's wired...

@tony.young4650 You power cycled the ER605 and it didn't come back? Any log messages around the time it stopped communicating? I assume it's still functioning, just not responding to the controller?...

@glp_66 5.9.XX for the OC200 should be arriving shortly (I would guess within the 4 weeks of your return window) and then it will be a simple Migration exercise. You will be able to migrate at some...

@farmer1 If you are not averse to setting up the new Linux controller on a new IP in the same subnet as your current OC200, the I would set it up and use the 5.9.9 Site migration wizard, not the...

@farmer1 You're not imagining things I have failed 3 different ways going from OC200 5.7 to Linux 5.9. I had previously gone 5.7-> 5.8 ->5.9 Linux using the standard methodology. Will try OC-> Linux...