Forums/
Feature Request (Deco)
a week ago
Re:{bug Report] ULA IPs in the fd00::/8 subnet range rejected when setting as a manual DNS server IP
htkoca wrote @evilbunny that is plain sad as a be85 two unit combo is as expensive as a basic unifi setup. For devices costing up to $1.5k CAD you'd think they would have something as basic as local...
0HELPFULS
Forums/
Feature Request (Deco)
a week ago
Re:{bug Report] ULA IPs in the fd00::/8 subnet range rejected when setting as a manual DNS server IP
htkoca wrote @David-TP it's months since this message, yet still unsupported. Any news? I actually ended up getting a router that can run the latest stable OpenWRT and it has full ULA support out of...
0HELPFULS
Forums/
Feature Request (Deco)
2025-09-29 06:53:45
Re:{bug Report] ULA IPs in the fd00::/8 subnet range rejected when setting as a manual DNS server IP
You are correct that only routable addresses are accepted for DNS server IPs for the router itself, but the DHCPv4 section does accept RFC1918 addresses which are then sent to clients in DHCPv4...
0HELPFULS
Forums/
Deco
2025-09-28 04:32:00
Appreciate your help in getting ULA addresses to work for DNS IPv6 IPs, that's a great start... Just FYI about DUIDs so the following paragraphs make sense. DUIDs are usually based on a MAC address...
0HELPFULS
Forums/
Deco
2025-09-28 03:31:51
Seems this issue got lost in there too, as someone posted about ULA IPs being rejected in 2023... https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/604494 Since that's been closed off I opened a new...
0HELPFULS
Forums/
Feature Request (Deco)
2025-09-28 03:29:40
As reported back in 2023 (https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/604494) the app doesn't allow IPv6 DNS server IPs in the ULA (fd00::/8) range to be used, saying the IP is invalid. This...
3HELPFULS
