1
Votes

Access control using port ranges

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
 
1
Votes

Access control using port ranges

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Access control using port ranges
Access control using port ranges
2023-12-01 10:15:12 - last edited 2023-12-01 10:26:29
Tags: #Access Control Rule
Model: Archer AX6000  
Hardware Version: V2
Firmware Version: 1.1.3 Build 20230906 rel.52177(5553)

Bring back the function to block specific port passing through the router, as described in this article:

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/158/

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/561/

(though some similar features like blocking based on keywards might be useless nowadays).

 

This will make it harder for users to bypass DNS settings on the router. It would be harder to bypass, but still possible. But harder is better for me.

 

There are also other users requesting/needing this feature (though not over here):

https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/100081

https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/222642

https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/rvxj9y/blocking_port_on_ax1800_router/

https://www.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments/wbxt0f/force_redirect_port_53_traffic_on_tp_link_router/

https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/ds6el3/am_i_crazy_is_port_blockingaccess_control_not/

https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/qf9qnk/how_do_i_block_udp_port_443_on_my_tplink_ax11000/

https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/12ru5za/is_it_possible_to_access_the_underlying_linux/

 

#1
Options

Information

Helpful: 1

Views: 240

Replies: 0

Voters 1

voter's avatar

Tags

Access Control Rule