Accepted WAN/LAN auto-sensing

Background:
 There is a typical network topology:

Some users might notice that, once the internet service fails, they are no longer able to access the NAS server from the local network.
The cause of this Phenomenon:
 When internet service went down and the cable modem failed to provide an IP address for Main Deco, both Ethernet ports on the main Deco would work as WAN ports to detect internet connection. NAS would no longer obtain an IP address from Deco.
Why do we use WAN/LAN auto-sensing on Deco?
 For the Deco Mesh system, normally, it would have more than 2 units, and each unit has at least 2 Ethernet ports; It would be time-consuming and confusing to find out which port should be connected to the ISP modem. And supposing that the WAN port is fixed, once this port is broken, the whole Mesh kit would be useless.
Recommended Solutions:
- Given that the issue arises only when the ISP modem fails to assign an IP address for the main Deco, once the cable modem recovers, the problem should be resolved. It is suggested to contact the ISP to restore the modem connection as a priority.
- The current workaround would be connecting the wired servers to the satellite Deco units instead of the main one.
- And we have also implemented enhancements on certain models, ensuring that the WAN port remains constant as long as the physical Ethernet connection between the modem and main Deco is unchanged, even when there is no internet service from the modem. Moreover, it is also planned to support manually fixing a specific Ethernet port as the WAN post on the Deco APP later.
The following models already support fixing the WAN port:
| Deco X80-5G Deco X50-5G Deco X20-4G Deco X50/X55_V1/V1.2 Deco X20/X60_V4 Deco X60_V3/3.2/V4.2 | 1.11.0 Firmware Platform Understand the Differences Among Deco Firmware Platforms 
 | 
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
  @SGTM It is not working for me.
  
Still waiting an official solution by TP-Link.
But it is clear that they do not care....
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@TP-Link I tried different options and found that enabling IPTV/VLAN -> Bridge -> Select Port on Main Router is now providing Ethernet access via the other Port.
Works great so far (last 10 min). Need to wait to see if it holds up.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
There is a new firmware released in late December that fixes this issue 1.4.0. However, while it fixes this issue it creates a new issue that may be worse. Since the firmware can't be rolled back and it was so impacting to me as my wife and I both work from home, I ended up having to buy a new router. So be warned on upgrading firmware.
DECO X55 firmware 1.4.0 - Constantly releasing WAN IP
https://community.tp-link.com/us/home/forum/topic/741422
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Unacceptable that if the ISP Router has problems, the Mesh Deco S7 become useless and the local network doesn't work.
 The worst thing is that this problem has been reported for 4 YEARS ago, but TP Link hasn't fixed this bug yet.
 They don't care about their customers, simple as this.
I'll not buy TP-Link anymore, simple as this.
I just made my 1star review on Amazon.
I'm just sorry that I discovered this bug too late for the free return.
4 years and no fix for a bug like this???!!!!
UNACCEPTABLE
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
  @Sus_Deco it's really hard to say as the scanner on this thread objects and blocks messages with competitors names. 
  
there is an open source project for the old linksys routers - and a hardware manufacturer that uses that firmware. The hardware has gli in their name
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Mark-R Hi Mark. Can I ask which open source you went with? I moved from TP-Link (waste of time and money) to Orbi for network and ring for camera. I'm not happy with either cloud/subscription model. I'm keen to look at open source instead. mozzie4 at gmail dot com Thanks
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
  @noizex I agree. I can't work out how anyone in the company thinks this is correct behaviour for a router function. 
  
and the companies lack of response has removed tplink from consideration for any future purchase or recommendations by me. 
  
and that they publish such incorrect descriptions of how their own products actually work - and then ignore active, but 4 years running discussions like this one is incredible (and not in a good way). 
  
I've bitten the bullet and gone open source for my systems as finding non-cloud dependent commercial products seems hard! And I don't fancy throwing money at others just to find issues and a lack of support once it's too late - like I did wi the tplink.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Well, I just learned about this the tough way, when my fiber went down and my entire home automation and NAS stopped working. I mean, how is this even some decision that was made consciously? I bought this (quite expensive to be honest) solution to not have to put yet another router and benefit from simplicity it brings, but having my LAN torn down when there is internet outage is unacceptable. I'm really surprised I didn't realize this earlier, but this week I had multiple outages and started wondering - how the hell is my local network not available as well?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
  @C0deape I agree - which was why I chose the products in the first place. They perform well (or rather fast!) and are easy to manage, but this one issues is a complete showstopper for anyone with non-cloud dependent home automation! In my case as well as the lightweight stuff like plex, I also have my heating and some lighting depended on a functional wifi network. This behaviour renders TPlink products inconcievable in this context - and the companies lack of awareness and support is a complete deal breaker for me.
 
 sadly, I then feel guilty even trying to sell the devices second hand - making the 5 decos I have worthless :( I so wish we could get some response from the company (mind you - maybe that's part of what the US authorities are complaining about!). I even tried emailing the UK MD and got not even an acknowledgment of the message.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Mark-R it is pretty poor, especially as these issues don't immediately present themselves (so cant easily return the kit). With the potential US ban (which will no doubt cascade to elsewhere if it goes through) replacing the kit might be the easiest option. Shame as the kit options tick a lot of boxes for solid build houses (powerline, outdoor, ethernet backhaul)...
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content

Information
Helpful: 159
Views: 115035
Replies: 326
Voters 157





























































































































































