maximum data transfer rate Archer be800

maximum data transfer rate Archer be800

17 Reply
Re:maximum data transfer rate Archer be800
a week ago

  @ppredator83 

TP-Link got worse each update. Hence we no longer get updates.

They have developers who seem rather clueless to what they are doing.

 

More info here:
https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/851396

 

And here:

https://community.tp-link.com/us/home/forum/topic/665532

https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/858330

 

Long story short:

The BE800 can only do 5 GHz OR 6 GHz. Not both together.

As shown in the screenshots, the router is capable of around 3.5-4.0 Gbps upload/download on 6 GHz 320 MHz. But they completely butchered it.

  1  
1
#12
Options
Re:maximum data transfer rate Archer be800
a week ago

  @MDA400 

 

Wrong. The developers broken something completely.

@ppredator83 seems to be on the correct path. No idea what they are doing, but speeds are being limited.

 

If not, anyone with a:

Samsung S24 Ultra

Samsung S25 Ultra

Samsung S26 Ultra

And a BE800 show me a speedtest of the device doing 3.5 Gbps download and upload.

As it could do in the past. Screenshots and speedtest results on other threads.

 

Any user or any developer showing me fast speeds on their BE800 and the settings used can proof us wrong.

But sadly..... none have been found so far.

  0  
0
#13
Options
Re:maximum data transfer rate Archer be800
a week ago

Hello  @ppredator83 ,

Thank you very much for providing such detailed and professional information.

 

First, we need to clarify the definition of "maximum rate"; it does not represent the direct throughput of a single device.
Aggregate Rate vs. Single-Device Rate: The peak rate listed in the product specifications represents the theoretical sum of the rates across all frequency bands (2.4GHz + 5GHz + 6GHz) when the router is simultaneously communicating with multiple high-end devices. This figure reflects the router's overall wireless capacity, rather than the actual internet speed that a single device can achieve.
Physical Layer (PHY) Rate vs. Actual Throughput: The negotiated rate displayed when a device connects (e.g., 2882 Mbps) represents the theoretical upper limit at the physical layer. During actual data transmission, various overheads must be deducted—including Wi-Fi protocol overhead, encryption overhead, signal retransmissions, and background system processes. Typically, the actual effective throughput is approximately 60% to 70% of the negotiated rate.

 

Based on your description, we currently need to focus on troubleshooting the following key points:

1. Does your network topology match the following diagram?
ISP Modem — Router )))((( Client Device
(Note: — represents a wired connection; )))((( represents a wireless connection.)
2. What is your internet plan? (e.g., 1000 Mbps / 1.2 Gbps / 2 Gbps?)
3. Is your laptop connected to the router via an Ethernet cable? If so, which specific port is it connected to? (2.5G port or 10Gbps port?)
4. Is your ISP modem connected to the router's 10G WAN port? If so, have you tried connecting your laptop directly to the modem to test the modem's actual wired connection speed?
5. When testing wireless speeds, please ensure that only one wireless device is active during the testing process. Please provide the speed test results separately for connections utilizing only the 5GHz band, only the 6GHz band, and the MLO (5GHz + 6GHz) mode. Additionally, please check and report the "Link Speed" displayed for each specific frequency band; for detailed instructions on how to do this, please refer to the relevant FAQ: How to check the associated/link speed on a wireless client


We look forward to receiving your test results so that we may proceed with the next steps of our analysis.

Welcome to Our Community! Get the latest posts: △New Firmware for Archer GE550/GE650 V1 Introduces AI-QoS, EasyMesh IoT Expansion, and More! △New Firmware Releases for Archer BE805 V1/BE450 V1 to Support VPN Merge, New ECO Mode, and More! More posts, please see: △ Get the Ongoing Pre-release Firmware for Wi-Fi Routers Here— Subscribe for Updates! Urgent problems with your Wi-Fi Router, Range Extender, or DSL Modem? Please reach out via private Messages or @Joesph-TP in your new thread directly. Click Or ☆Recommended Solution if the post/answer helps.
  0  
0
#14
Options
Re:maximum data transfer rate Archer be800
a week ago

  @MDA400 Hello. Yes, Flow Control mode is disabled! But my router isn't under any heavy load! The Wi-Fi signal strength is average! The speed is 1500 Mbps! In MLO mode, the speed is 2000-2100 Mbps! Of course, I expected more from this router for such a large sum of money!

  0  
0
#15
Options
Re:maximum data transfer rate Archer be800
a week ago

  @Joseph-TP 

Good afternoon, and thank you for your reply!

As you requested, I took screenshots.

1. My internet plan is 100 Mbps! But I need the fastest local network from my Asus laptop through a Be800 router and then to my S26 Ultra!

2. My laptop is only connected via 6 GHz Wi-Fi! The wired network card with an RJ-45 connector is only 1000 Mbps (it can't provide any faster speed).

3. My internet speed is 100 Mbps. In January, I had a speed of 500 Mbps. The speed worked perfectly both via cable and Wi-Fi!

My internet provider is connected to the SFP port. I tried the WAN port, but I didn't notice any difference in speed; it's too small.

I would like firmware manufacturers to take into account user requests and provide the ability to enable the MAXIMUM SPEED mode for the be800 router!

File:
6ghz.jpgDownload
  0  
0
#16
Options
Re:maximum data transfer rate Archer be800
a week ago

  @Joseph-TP   samsung s26 ultra my smartphone 

File:
Screenshot_20260525_225254_Settings.jpgDownload
  0  
0
#17
Options
Re:maximum data transfer rate Archer be800
a week ago

Hello  @ppredator83 ,

Thanks for your reply.

 

Based on the information you have provided so far, your primary objective is to achieve the highest possible local network transmission speeds (i.e., LAN speeds).

 

According to the test data you supplied (please feel free to correct me if there are any discrepancies):

1.  S26 Ultra link rate on the 6GHz band: 4803/4803 Mbps
2.  ASUS laptop link rate on the 6GHz band: 5764/5764 Mbps
3.  Measured bidirectional LAN transfer speeds: approximately 2017 Mbps (downlink) / 2302 Mbps (uplink)

 

First, regarding the conversion of wireless speeds, it is important to clarify the following: A Wi-Fi "link rate" represents a theoretical physical-layer limit; it does not equate to the actual usable application-layer throughput. When translating this figure into the file transfer speeds or speed test results you ultimately perceive, a significant portion of the bandwidth is consumed by the protocol itself. The primary overheads involved include protocol signaling and environmental attenuation.

 

Based on your data, your current actual transfer speeds are achieving approximately 35% to 48% of the theoretical link rate. In a real-world home Wi-Fi 7 environment, this level of conversion efficiency is considered exceptionally good performance.

 

Second, your Local Area Network (LAN) speed and your Wide Area Network (WAN—i.e., the Internet) bandwidth operate as two independent channels. Theoretically, a change in your broadband subscription plan should not directly impact the LAN-internal speeds you measure.

 

You mentioned that everything—both wired and wireless—was "perfect" back when you were on the 500 Mbps broadband plan. This is a valuable observation. To help us pinpoint the issue more clearly, could you recall or provide additional details regarding this? Specifically, what were the device-to-device transfer speeds you measured within your LAN—using the exact same testing methodology—during that previous 500 Mbps era? This information will help us determine whether your current results (hovering around 2.3 Gbps) reflect normal fluctuations or a genuine discrepancy.

 

All things considered, your current wireless LAN performance is already quite outstanding. Measured speeds exceeding 2 Gbps are more than sufficient for the vast majority of high-bandwidth internal network applications—such as large-scale file synchronization, high-definition media editing, and high-speed data backups. If you anticipate even higher demands in the future, you might consider equipping your laptop with a high-speed wired network adapter; however, your existing wireless setup is already capable of delivering a truly superior user experience. I hope this analysis proves helpful to you!

Welcome to Our Community! Get the latest posts: △New Firmware for Archer GE550/GE650 V1 Introduces AI-QoS, EasyMesh IoT Expansion, and More! △New Firmware Releases for Archer BE805 V1/BE450 V1 to Support VPN Merge, New ECO Mode, and More! More posts, please see: △ Get the Ongoing Pre-release Firmware for Wi-Fi Routers Here— Subscribe for Updates! Urgent problems with your Wi-Fi Router, Range Extender, or DSL Modem? Please reach out via private Messages or @Joesph-TP in your new thread directly. Click Or ☆Recommended Solution if the post/answer helps.
  0  
0
#18
Options