Deco X10 satellite speed much lower than main Deco even at very close distance

Deco X10 satellite speed much lower than main Deco even at very close distance

Deco X10 satellite speed much lower than main Deco even at very close distance
Deco X10 satellite speed much lower than main Deco even at very close distance
a week ago
Model: Deco X10  
Hardware Version: V1
Firmware Version: 1.4.0

Hello,

I would like to ask for clarification from TP-Link regarding the real-world satellite performance of the Deco X10 in a 1 Gbps fiber environment.

I recently upgraded my internet connection from DSL 100 Mbps to fiber 1000 Mbps. My setup is:

  • ISP: fiber 1 Gbps
  • ISP router: Vantiva / fiber router
  • Deco system: 2 × TP-Link Deco X10
  • Deco operation mode: Access Point mode
  • Firmware: Updated to the latest available version
  • QoS: Disabled
  • Main Deco connected to the ISP router by Ethernet
  • Second Deco connected wirelessly as a satellite

The issue is the large speed difference between the main Deco and the satellite Deco.

Speed test results

Using the ISP router Wi-Fi directly:

  • Close to the ISP router: approximately 900 Mbps – 1 Gbps
  • In the second room: approximately 700 Mbps

Using Deco X10:

  • Close to the main Deco: approximately 600–900 Mbps
  • Close to the satellite Deco: approximately 200–300 Mbps

The important point is that I also tested the two Deco X10 units very close to each other, in the same room. Even then, the satellite Deco still gives only around 200–300 Mbps, while the main Deco gives much higher speeds.

The Deco app shows that:

  • The satellite Deco is connected to the main Deco
  • Signal/source quality is shown as “Good”
  • The client device is connected to the expected satellite Deco
  • QoS is disabled
  • The system is now in Access Point mode

The client device is a recent premium Samsung phone, and when connected directly to the COSMOTE router from the second room it can reach around 700 Mbps, so the client device and the house layout do not seem to be the main limitation.

My questions

  1. Is 200–300 Mbps on a wireless satellite Deco X10 considered normal/expected behavior for this model, even when the satellite is very close to the main Deco?
  2. Is this mainly due to the Deco X10 being a dual-band AX1500 system, where the same 5 GHz band is shared between client traffic and wireless backhaul?
  3. Is there any way in the Deco app to confirm whether the wireless backhaul between the two Deco X10 units is using 5 GHz or 2.4 GHz?
  4. Does the “Good” signal indication in the Deco app only mean connection quality, or does it also indicate high-capacity backhaul performance?
  5. Is the Deco X10 intended to support near-gigabit speeds only when used as the main wired Deco or with Ethernet backhaul, but not as a wireless satellite?
  6. Would upgrading to a stronger Deco system, such as Deco X60 v4.20 2-pack or Deco XE75 Pro 2-pack, be expected to significantly improve wireless satellite speed in this scenario?

I understand that theoretical Wi-Fi speeds are not the same as real-world throughput. However, the difference is quite large: the ISP router alone gives around 700 Mbps in the second room, while the Deco X10 satellite gives only around 200–300 Mbps, even with good signal and even when tested close to the main Deco.

I would appreciate an official clarification on whether this is expected behavior for the Deco X10 wireless satellite/backhaul design, or whether there is something else I should check in configuration or diagnostics.

Thank you.

0
0
#1
1 Reply
Re:Deco X10 satellite speed much lower than main Deco even at very close distance
a week ago

  @kyriakoy 

Hi, welcome to the community.

Please note that the satellite Deco unit is not primarily designed to improve internet speed; it is designed to extend Wi-Fi coverage throughout your home. For instance, if you are currently using an ISP router and find that certain areas (known as "dead zones") have no Wi-Fi signal (resulting in poor speeds), a Deco system can help. By placing a satellite Deco unit between the main Deco unit and the dead zone, you can effectively extend the main Deco's Wi-Fi signal into that dead zone, thereby ensuring that those areas receive a stronger signal and better speeds. However, if your home already enjoys excellent Wi-Fi signal strength and speeds in every area while using your ISP router, then there is no need to deploy additional Deco nodes. 
In the specific scenario you described, I do not believe it is necessary to place a satellite Deco unit in the second room.

 

Regarding the questions you raised:

1. Considering the real-world environmental factors, such as signal interference, physical obstacles, etc., a wireless download speed of 200–300 Mbps for the satellite Deco X10 falls within the normal range, albeit on the lower side. In this particular case, the satellite Deco's wireless speed is relatively low because it needs to simultaneously communicate with both the main Deco unit and the connected client devices. Typically, a satellite Deco establishes the 2.4 GHz & 5 GHz Wi-Fi backhaul with the main Deco unit. Within the Deco app, you can tap a specific satellite Deco unit (and tap again to open its detailed settings page) to view which Deco unit it is connected to, whether the connection is wired or wireless, and which Wi-Fi band it uses.

 

2. A "Good" signal strength indicates that the connection quality between the satellite Deco and the main Deco unit is robust, resulting in higher backhaul speeds. If you wish to achieve similar wireless speeds on the satellite Deco as the main Deco unit, it's recommended to connect the satellite Deco to the main Deco via Ethernet cable.

 

3. Theoretically, using models such as the Deco X60 or XE75 Pro should result in faster speeds on the satellite Deco units compared to the Deco X10. However, given the potential for environmental interference and other real-world factors, we cannot guarantee a significant improvement in speed.

 

Best Regards

0
0
#2