Request: Option to Disable IR Light in Night Mode
The red dots of the IR light, while potentially useful for alerting anyone approaching, can be too conspicuous and inadvertently reveal the camera’s location. I understand that these red dots cannot be turned off as they are integral to the IR light’s function.
Therefore, I would like to request an option to turn off the IR light in night mode.
In situations with sufficient ambient light, additional illumination from the IR LEDs may not be necessary.
Disabling them would also offer energy savings (around 1.5W in my case). This could be a significant saving over time, especially if multiple cameras are in use.
Additionally, this feature would allow users to position cameras indoors behind windows for nighttime surveillance without the glare caused by IR reflection.
I am not certain if this feature is technically feasible.
However, the ability to choose between discretion and night clarity would provide greater flexibility for TP-Link camera users.
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
I would love to have the option to disable the internal IR in night mode due to severe spider issues since those are heavily attracted by the light and hence think that is a perfect place for web just in front of the lense... I would like use an external IR source instead to get rid of this never ending issue. Pleeease :-)
BR
Lars
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have the same problem, I want to disable the IR permanently
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
I don't know why tapo is so tone deaf about what they should be providing users for functionality.
I did design work for 20 years throughout all technologies across the decades. I've worked in four service departments in electronics design companies, worked my way up through engineering, design, product lifecycles, compliance testing, user testing, done it all. I requested several times that they stopped reinventing the square wheel and give us the functionality that's been standard for a decades. in surveillance systems.
Controlled lighting across the entire spectrum that a camera is capable of receiving is basic design requirement for most standard surveillance systems for decades. Either through control systems or integrated.
The C520ws is a design disaster from the top using basic motors for a function that requires stepping motors, not considering that pesky variable humidity in their friction models so it never lines up. Cheap chips with limited capabilities for tracking and detection, poor poor poor user and service experience.
Basically, the initial response to this thread would have never been posted at most of the places I've worked. The word pathetic comes to mind.
They won't change it because they didn't design the electronics to allow variable infared. When engineers do the user testing, products always have great potential but fail epically during implementation. Most of them don't think dynamically enough.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 35
Views: 10111
Replies: 39
