Web UI Configuration

The initial plan of the Deco Whole Mesh system is to configure via Deco APP as we hope to provide a super-easy installation and non-high tech required experience.
Due to this commitment, Deco APP allows us to quickly and easily install Mesh Wi-Fi System by just following the step-by-step set-up wizard. Some users commented, ”This thing literally holds your hand through the full setup. 99% of people will hit next, next, next, and you are on the internet” which is just what we want.
Next, Deco App allows monitoring the home Wi-Fi from anywhere without bringing a laptop and making changes right from your smartphone or tablet. So as long as taking your smartphone with you, the home network activity is under your control.
Then, with a few taps on the APP, the advanced features, like Parental Control, Port Forwarding, and QoS are ready to go.
Moreover, when it comes to firmware upgrades, the Deco APP will automatically push a message when new firmware is ready. All you need to do is click “Update Deco”.
While, with the time going on, we gradually received some feedback that users hope Deco could be configured via web UI or more advanced features could be configured on the web interface. Unfortunately, there has been no plan to add these features yet.
But we are open to any feedback and would be appreciated it if you could let us know why you prefer web configuration to APP setup. So we would collect more brilliant ideas which might be taken into consideration along with the future APP upgrade.
Thank you very much for your attention and please feel free to comment below.
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Retired Data Network Engineer. I just purchased a Deco BE11000. I am beside myself there is no useful web interface. Good news is that I purchased at Costco and can easily return it. The performance is very good. I am not comfortable with the lack of management tools.
I am amazed this thread is over two years old and nothing has changed. I have a strong suspicion TP-Link does not want the end user to have control over the router because it might threaten their ability to collect our personal data.
I am rethinking this purchase and will probably move into something else .
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Bisquit_Brain I chose to keep the Deco X50 twin pack and use them as just wif fi access points as they fit in with decor without ceiling mounting and use the Omada router as my primary you have full control over the network if you choose to use local and vpn remote in to manage rather than cloud management only your access points still need to be managed via the Deco app. good news is they are only wif access points so not much to manage anyway other than view the wi fi stats the rest can be controlled on the Omada router.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have a feeling it's more so they can force us to buy new equipment when they decide this model is EOL by simply disabling all management functions and possibly the unit itself.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@null Would you PLEASE stop copy and pasting that same garbage response and give your customers what they're demainding? We don't give a flip about your "Initial Plan".
Really sorry customer service!
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Greg_Possed_off Its all on deaf ears...TP-Link do not want the consumer to have Web Gui access, i in particular as a networking engineer should have known better, i was after a solution i could use instead of running additional power to a pfsense firewall (should of stuck with that).
I found a solution by just running the Deco in AP mode (little changes or monitoring needed) and using an SMB router solution with 4G failover, we are still on old FTTN technology so i have bridged in my VDSL modem router to the SMB router...problem kind of solved, i really only need to control the router most of the time which runs stand alone (can VPN in to manage it remotely)
This solution is the best work around i can advise for people wanting more control over the network. The Deco AP nodes still require cloud app to manage which is fine as they are just wi fi access points.
I would of went down the SMB access point path but the mesh nodes are all either ceiling mount or wall fixture...i went with consumer Deco as they sit nicely on top of desks/cabinets/shelves.
For anyone interested in which SMB router i chose, i went with the Omada ER706W-4G, the ER707 is another good one that i think has a 2.5GB lan port ( no LTE) if you are using the X50 pro.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@TP-Link Realy need a web UI
Using my tiny phone to add clients and mac address is near impossible, then there is adding black list, securing the internet access firewall
Its a joke trying to use my 6 inch screen
when will you listen to your customers, even my TP-Link routers have web UI why not my Deco router its not cheap at HK$4,000
I am sure your techies are more than capable of coding for PC
If not then I dont know what type of coders you have,,,,
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@TP-Link I have an Erro device that also requires an app to configure. I am considering spending £hundreds on a new device to avoid this, and I though that TP-Link might have an honest product that does what it needs to do without the privacy invading, awkward, phone-OS-specific apps etc. for my home-office. Turns out I was wrong.
Having waded through 38 pages of user complaints I registered to say you're losing business & customers.
We, users, do not need an online service or an account with a 3rd party for the sake of local routing. You may 'need' it for marketing/sale-of-data/who-knows-what, but it's nothing but an anti-feature for us.
While an app may be convenient for some, you're ruling out a large class of home-professionals who know better than to open their private network to a coproration.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content

Information
Helpful: 306
Views: 153543
Replies: 533
Voters 308



















































































































































































































































































































