XX530v is capped at 50Mb download in a 500Mb plan
I installed this device in my house, put fiber directly on it, it registered without issues.
But I noticed a odd issue:
Any download is always capped at 50Mb/s (my plan is 500Mb/s for both downloads and uploads), but UPLOADS happen at full speed (500Mb/s).
I tried some troubleshooting but nothing seems to work!
If I return to the old ONU I was using, it downloads at full 500Mb/s (ONU in bridge mode and XX530v connecting via PPPoE).
As soon as I return the fiber cable to XX530v, the problem happens again.
I suspect it might have to do with firmware (I've updated it to latest firmware), but the problem is I can't find the original firmware that came with it (Firmware Version:0.4.0 3.0.0 v6096.0 Build 240426 Rel.38762n).
ISP told me this router is compatilble, and they advised me to contact TP LINK, which I'm doing, because it might be a software fault on device's side.
Local TP Link support couldn't help me. They just say the same old stuff like "this router is targeted to ISP, so ISP has to help you... etc etc etc".
It seems this is a secret device only ISPs have access.
I mean, come ou guys! This router is sold in many places, and we currently can buy it from stores and install it ourselves.
TP LINK has to support this device because it's sold to end users!
My network already directed me to contact Tp Link, so I demand a solution!
And my ISP is very open, you only need the right GPON SERIAL to connect. Pratically any device can be used in their network as long as the GPON SN is right.
I even tried another ONU (different from the original) and no problem with it as well.
There was even a similar topic in this forums with the EXACT SAME PROBLEM.
GPON XX530v V1 - Download speed limited to less than 50MB
Can anyone escalate it to engineers?
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
@MaracaKan
@Rabatonfr
In web UI, go to "Advanced" -> "GPON WAN", and edit the current WAN interface.
Go to the very bottom of the page and see if "Mac Clone" is active.
If it is, disable it, by choosing "Do not clone Mac Address".
I found many people online with that problem.
@Joseph-TP I did some tests, and my conclusion is if current WAN interface uses a MAC address that's NOT from Tp Link, download speeds will be limited to 50Mb/s.
What I did exactly:
Disabled Mac Clone, and connected to internet. Then I copied MAC address from WAN interface, available from Advanced -> Status page.
IF I clone this MAC address (by editing WAN interface), or if I increment the last character by 1, it connects normally, with full speed.
If I clone any other mac address (both from my original ONU, or a completely random value), downloads are limited to 50mb/s.
I don't know if it's a bug in firmware, or something that's been done on purpose to limit speed, but it's something that's happening exclusively on tp link devices.
Devices affected:
XX230v
XX530v (V1)
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello everyone,
@Rabatonfr @MaracaKan @Litiano @alb3530 @DennisTT @HoiWong @grad1e @shu006 @Yash_Kanawjia @Romain_L @LeticileTebogo @AnantJo @Uttaran @GabrielNunez @PatrickPPP @Miroslav01 @jrandis @Lekao @KURUMIN
We know some of you have been experiencing an unexpected behavior on the XX530v V1, where download speeds are capped at around 50 Mbps when using PPPoE with MAC Clone. We want to provide a pre-release firmware to address it.
| Model & Hardware | Download Link |
| XX530v_V1 | XX530v_V1_0.9.0_3.0.0_Build 251126 (Pre-release version) |
Please download and install the beta firmware, then reply to this thread (or contact us) to let us know:
- Did your download speed improve to expected levels?
- Did you encounter any other issues?
@xigga The reported IPv6 RA Lifetime optimization has been implemented on this version. Please update to confirm.
Your feedback is essential to validate this fix and move towards a stable release.
Thank you all for your continued support and feedback.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello @Kevin_Z and team,
I have tested the pre-release firmware 0.9.0 3.0.0 Build 251126 on the XX530v V1 and compared it with 0.7.0 3.0.0 Build 250606, focusing on IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) behavior and Lifetime configuration. Below is a comprehensive report with all observed behaviors, regressions, and critical issues.
Device and Test Environment
-
Hardware: XX530v v1.0
-
Test Client: Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W, DietPi (Debian-based)
-
Interface: wlan0
-
Tool Used:
rdisc6(from ndisc6 package) -
Command:
rdisc6 wlan0 -
IPv6 Configuration: Address Type: RADVD via RA
-
Settings Tested:
- Advanced > LAN Settings > IPv6 (Lifetime Value)
- Advanced > Security > Access Control (ON/OFF / Allowlist / Deny list)
1. Lifetime Handling
| Firmware | Lifetime Configured | Router Lifetime | Prefix Valid / Pref | Route Lifetime | DNS Lifetime | Notes |
| 0.7.0 | 1440 min (86400s) | 1800s | 86400 / 86400s | 30s | 10s | Prefix lifetime correct; router lifetime fixed |
| 0.7.0 | 30 min (1800s) | 1800s | 86400 / 86400s | 30s | 10s | Prefix lifetime remains correct |
| 0.9.0 | 86400s | ~20864s | 300 / 300s | 30s | 900s | Prefix lifetime ignored; high router lifetime misapplied |
| 0.9.0 | 1800s | 1800s | 300 / 300s | 30s | 900s | Low lifetime correct, prefix still fixed |
Key Observations:
-
0.9.0 regresses prefix lifetime handling: Configured prefix valid/preferred lifetimes are ignored (fixed at 300s).
-
Router lifetime miscalculation: Large values are applied incorrectly in 0.9.0 (~20864s vs 86400s).
-
Route lifetime remains statically 30s in all firmware versions.
-
DNS lifetime is unusually low (10s in 0.7.0; 900s in 0.9.0), which may affect Address Type: RADVD reliability.
-
Persistence: Configured lifetime in 0.9.0 does not persist after reboot (resets to 1800s).
2. RA Duplication and ACL Behavior
| Firmware | ACL Setting | RA Behavior | IPv6 Connectivity |
| 0.7.0 | OFF | Duplicate RA entries | Stable |
| 0.7.0 | ON (Allowlist) | Single RA | Client IPv6 fails |
| 0.9.0 | OFF | Duplicate RA entries | Stable |
| 0.9.0 | ON (Allowlist) | Single RA | Client IPv6 fails |
Observation:
-
When ACL Allowlist is ON in 0.9.0, RA messages are suppressed, causing Address Type: RADVD to fail and clients to lose IPv6 connectivity.
-
RA duplication (seen when ACL is OFF) appears to be keeping IPv6 connectivity alive, but this is non-standard and unreliable.
-
ACL OFF or ACL ON with Deny list allows normal IPv6 operation.
3. Comparative Analysis
| Parameter | 0.7.0 | 0.9.0 | Regression / Notes |
| Prefix Lifetime | Config-respected | Fixed 300s | Regression |
| Router Lifetime | Fixed 1800s | Low: OK / High: Fail | High values misapplied in 0.9.0 |
| Route Lifetime | 30s | 30s | Issue persists |
| DNS Lifetime | 10s | 900s | Still unusually low |
| RA Duplication | ACL-dependent | ACL-dependent | Critical: Allowlist suppresses RA |
| Persistence | Persists | Resets to 1800s | Regression in 0.9.0 |
4. Expected Behavior
-
Configured Lifetime Value should persist after a reboot.
-
Router lifetime should scale accurately with the configured value.
-
Prefix valid/preferred lifetimes should match configured values.
-
Route and DNS lifetimes should be reasonable relative to configured values.
-
RA messages should always be advertised to clients, independent of ACL allowlist/deny list settings.
-
RA duplication should be eliminated.
5. Impact & Recommendations
Impact:
-
Instability: Rapid IPv6 address expiration (300s prefix) leads to frequent Address Type: RADVD renewals.
-
Connectivity Failure: ACL allowlist prevents clients from maintaining a public IPv6 address.
-
Manual Overhead: Reconfiguration is required after every reboot due to the lifetime reset.
Recommendations:
-
Fix prefix lifetime regression in 0.9.0.
-
Apply router lifetime correctly for all configured values.
-
Ensure RA messages are advertised even when ACL Allowlist is enabled.
-
Make configured lifetime persistent across reboots.
6. Additional Feedback & Feature Requests
In addition to the bug reports detailed above, I would also like to direct the engineering team's attention to my previous comment, which contains several suggestions for feature additions that would greatly improve this firmware:
https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/839982?replyId=1642906
Conclusion
Firmware 0.7.0 partially corrects prefix lifetime behavior but still has short route/DNS lifetimes. Firmware 0.9.0 introduces significant regressions regarding prefix lifetimes, value persistence, and a critical bug where the ACL Allowlist suppresses RA messages entirely.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Kevin_Z My XX530V firmware version 0.7.0 , got bsnl ftth new connection and using it for week, facing EPON Registering issue when modem resumes from powercut after power resume XX530V indefinetly in EPON Registering issue loop, even tp link GUI level reboot also not rectifying EPON Registering issue, only if i perform manual power OFF & ON via modem power button then modem automatically getting EPON Registration success
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Will test & report tomorrow.
But as per reports it seems to be working now.
Thanks TP-Link engineers.
Looking forward to stable version at the earliest.
Regards,
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
xMarcosx wrote
Kevin_Z wrote
Hello everyone,
@Rabatonfr @MaracaKan @Litiano @alb3530 @DennisTT @HoiWong @grad1e @shu006 @Yash_Kanawjia @Romain_L @LeticileTebogo @AnantJo @Uttaran @GabrielNunez @PatrickPPP @Miroslav01 @jrandis @Lekao @KURUMIN
We know some of you have been experiencing an unexpected behavior on the XX530v V1, where download speeds are capped at around 50 Mbps when using PPPoE with MAC Clone. We want to provide a pre-release firmware to address it.
Model & Hardware Download Link XX530v_V1 XX530v_V1_0.9.0_3.0.0_Build 251126 (Pre-release version)
Please download and install the beta firmware, then reply to this thread (or contact us) to let us know:
- Did your download speed improve to expected levels?
- Did you encounter any other issues?
@xigga The reported IPv6 RA Lifetime optimization has been implemented on this version. Please update to confirm.
Your feedback is essential to validate this fix and move towards a stable release.
Thank you all for your continued support and feedback.
Olá amigo, tudo bem?
Estou com dois equipamentos que precisam de atualização: XX530v V2 e XX230v. Gostaria de saber se já existe alguma previsão de nova atualização de firmware para correção do bug que esses aparelhos estão apresentando.
Poderia me informar se há alguma versão em desenvolvimento ou previsão de liberação?
Desde já, agradeço pelo suporte.
Thank you both for the comments and updates.
As I responded to Lekao, there will be new official firmware for other models and hardware. Please keep an eye on the regional official website for future updates.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Lekao wrote
O meu é a versao V2, serve para ele?
The provided pre-release firmware is only available for XX530v V1.0. It's not compatible with the hardware V2.![]()
There will be new official firmware for other models and hardware. Please keep an eye on the regional official website for future updates.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Kevin_Z Tested using 10 different MAC addresses from different vendors and issue has been resolved. Thank You VM for the firmware update. Now we can enjoy the speeds as promised. Can you also let the devs to know the "Via IPv6" option for telephony as seen on the v2 version?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Kevin_Z wrote
Hello everyone,
@Rabatonfr @MaracaKan @Litiano @alb3530 @DennisTT @HoiWong @grad1e @shu006 @Yash_Kanawjia @Romain_L @LeticileTebogo @AnantJo @Uttaran @GabrielNunez @PatrickPPP @Miroslav01 @jrandis @Lekao @KURUMIN
We know some of you have been experiencing an unexpected behavior on the XX530v V1, where download speeds are capped at around 50 Mbps when using PPPoE with MAC Clone. We want to provide a pre-release firmware to address it.
Model & Hardware Download Link XX530v_V1 XX530v_V1_0.9.0_3.0.0_Build 251126 (Pre-release version)
Please download and install the beta firmware, then reply to this thread (or contact us) to let us know:
- Did your download speed improve to expected levels?
- Did you encounter any other issues?
@xigga The reported IPv6 RA Lifetime optimization has been implemented on this version. Please update to confirm.
Your feedback is essential to validate this fix and move towards a stable release.
Thank you all for your continued support and feedback.
Olá amigo, tudo bem?
Estou com dois equipamentos que precisam de atualização: XX530v V2 e XX230v. Gostaria de saber se já existe alguma previsão de nova atualização de firmware para correção do bug que esses aparelhos estão apresentando.
Poderia me informar se há alguma versão em desenvolvimento ou previsão de liberação?
Desde já, agradeço pelo suporte.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello my friend! How are you?
I'd like to clarify: I tested the connection at a friend's house, and it worked perfectly since there was no need to clone the MAC address. When I use a cloned MAC, I notice that the internet connection gets limited.
I did this test to rule out any limitation from my internet service provider.
I also saw that a new update was released recently. In my case, my router is version V2.
If you can provide any guidance on this, I'd appreciate it
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
O meu é a versao V2, serve para ele?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you so much for your detailed feedback. I'm happy to hear that the download speed issue has been resolved with the provided beta firmware.
Regarding the EPON Registering issue when you first upgrade from 0.7.0 to 0.9.0, I hope others also pay attention to this behavior. We can then check whether it's just a coincidence or related to a specific ISP environment or firmware.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 12137
Replies: 95
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.
