@Solla-topee 

ok, but what happens when the camera automatically switches between different markers in patrol mode? The activity and privacy zones remain the same for all locations and this may make patrol mode unusable, don't you think?

If the camera can save positional information to know where it needs to go during patrol mode and it can save multiple privacy/detection zone blocks it should be possible it combine those to save privacy/detection zone blocks for each patrol position.

  @Solla-topee 

 

I agree with the user @Andlas. 

I have a 520WS camera in the middle of a long-fronted field because I didn't have another safe location to place it. I have three marks configured for patrol mode. Between marks 1 and 3, the perspectives are opposite, and therefore the zones configured for mark 1 won't match the rest, producing a lot of unwanted notifications, making this a disadvantage for the camera.
I'll give you an example of my case, where I need to see the entire front perimeter, in this case only for person detection. However, if I had to use line-crossing detection, it would be completely unusable.
So, I vote for the possibility of adding different activity zones at least 3 markers.

Thank you very much.

This is the front perimeter, (Panoramic view taken with the camera. Awesome!)

 

This is the setting for Mark 1:

 

Then for Mark 2 things obviously no longer match up:

 

And worse for Mark 3:

Activity zones should also be taken into account in patrol mode.