Deoc XE75 Mesh System with Hardware Ver 1.6 & 3.6 Units
Deoc XE75 Mesh System with Hardware Ver 1.6 & 3.6 Units
I have a couple questions about the XE75 hardware versions. I have a total of 5 units with 3 being hardware version 1.6 and 2 being version 3.6. Does anyone know the answer to these 2 questions.
1. Is there any problem with having mixed versions of hardware for my mesh system? I made one of the newer 3.6 versions my main router but wondering if there is any known issues with the older versions being satellites.
2. If I update the firmware in my 3.6 hardware version router to the new beta version, will it give me wireguard VPN capability? I assume since the router performs the VPN function, that the other satellites being the older version should work fine.
Any feedback is appreicated
Thanks,
jcp77
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sorry this took so long here is what I found out
Yes, you can use the firmware designed for hardware version 3.0 with your version 3.6 units. Here's why:
The hardware version displayed as 3.6 is equivalent to version 3.0. TP-Link operates multiple manufacturing facilities, and the manufacturing location of a product can be determined by its sub-model number. Items with versions ending in "6" or "8," like V3.6 or V3.8, are produced in one facility, while products without a "6" or "8" in the number are manufactured elsewhere. The sole distinction between these products lies in their manufacturing origins; all hardware and software components are identical. For instance, V3.6 is equivalent to V3.0.
This means the firmware for V3.0 will work perfectly with your V3.6 units since they share identical hardware and software components.
Remember you will want to use one of the deco units with hardware version 3.6 as your main unit as i stated here once you upgrade to the beta firmware. Here is a link to the post containing the beta firmware.
Firmware 1.4.0 for Deco XE75/XE5300/XE75 Pro V2/V3 Adds Wi-Fi Access Control, WireGuard VPN & More!
Thanks
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, it should be fine.
The only time that chart starts to get confusing and needs looking to further is when its the second digit (ie v1.28) as these have historically been more likely to use a different version or not be compatible.
Beta firmware can be a bit different, but typically they lean towards being more 'universal' than not.
I believe that the systems should also prevent you from applying an incompatible firmware outright - but we never want to rely on that with in-progress builds and firmware.
Also, the manufacturing location does affect the hardware version, but it is not a catch-all rule; there are several outliers that break it, making it far less reliable than you would expect.
Contact Support or Join our Official Subreddits: r/tapo, r/tplink, r/omada_networks
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 300
Replies: 12
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.
