Accepted WAN/LAN auto-sensing
Background:
There is a typical network topology:
Some users might notice that, once the internet service fails, they are no longer able to access the NAS server from the local network.
The cause of this Phenomenon:
When internet service went down and cable modem failed to provide IP address for Main Deco, both Ethernet ports on the main Deco would work as WAN ports to detect internet connection. NAS would no longer obtain an IP address from Deco.
Why do we use WAN/LAN auto-sensing on Deco?
For the Deco Mesh system, normally it would have more than 2 units and each unit has at least 2 Ethernet ports; It would be time-consuming and confusing to find out which port should be connected to the ISP modem. And supposing that the WAN port is fixed, once this port is broken, the whole Mesh kit would be useless.
Recommended Solutions:
- Given that the issue arises only when the ISP modem failed to assign IP address for the main Deco, once the cable modem recovered, the problem should be resolved. It is suggested to contact the ISP to restore the modem connection as a priority.
- The current workaround would be connecting the wired servers to the satellite Deco units, instead of the main one.
- And We have also implemented enhancements on certain models, ensuring that the WAN port remains constant as long as the physical Ethernet connection between the modem and main Deco is unchanged, even when there is no internet service from the modem.
- Moreover, It is also planned to support manually fixing a specific Ethernet port as WAN post on the Deco APP later. (Some models already support this feature, such as Deco X80-5G/Deco X20-4G)
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Same problem here. No auto sensing. Two satelite mesh devices can only connect via wifi to the main mesh. I have paved dedicated p2p cat6 cables from the main mesh to the two remote one. It will not connect over ethernet. 8mbps wire speed if not close to the main mesh. I'm shocked that people recommended this product. It's useless
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@TP-Link
What about a fix release for Deco M5 with HW version v3.0?
My home automation is down for 8 long months, because I was tired of resetting and re-configure my M5 to overcome your bug on daily basis
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi, the 1.7.1 firmware of Deco M5 has optimized this feature: The WAN Port would not be changed unless the physical connection between the modem and main Deco was broken.
Please check whether you have updated M5 to 1.7.1 already.
The failure of the Ethernet Backhaul is not related to WAN/LAN auto-sensing.
It would be great if you could start a new thread here to tell us more details, like the model number and network topology so that we could cooperate together to find what was thh problem.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for the feedback.
So far, the related firmware for Deco M9 Plus hasn't been released yet.
During the gap, you could send an email to support.forum@tp-link.com Subject---[Forum ID273992]WAN/LAN auto-sensing with a picture of your network topology and the current issue you have suffered so that I could consult with the engineers to see whether there is another workaround, like a beta fix.
Thank you again for your cooperation and support.
best regards.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
David-TP wrote
Hi, the 1.7.1 firmware of Deco M5 has optimized this feature: The WAN Port would not be changed unless the physical connection between the modem and main Deco was broken.
Please check whether you have updated M5 to 1.7.1 already.
The failure of the Ethernet Backhaul is not related to WAN/LAN auto-sensing.
It would be great if you could start a new thread here to tell us more details, like the model number and network topology so that we could cooperate together to find what was thh problem.
the optimisation you describe is still not correct! it doesn't need 'optimising' it NEEDS FIXING!
When a WAN outage occurs - or when the Modem provider issues a firmware update it is common practice for the Modem/Router to reboot.
When a modem/router reboots it will reinitialise the physical ethernet ports meaning they will appear to physically disconnect and reconnect. During a WAN failure this reboot will not have connection to the Internet (which I assume in this instance means the TP-Link cloud). The reconnect will therefore not be able to provide internet connection (as the WAN failure will remain) and the Deco's will mess up as they always have.
How hard is it to implement this the same way EVERY other manufacturer does it? Provide a configuration option to select and fix the outbound connection port. Use the code from OpenWRT if you don't have coders capable of writing this yourselves - it's really basic, actually - use the mesh code from there as well instead of your own.
Please stop -reinventing the wheel and STOP trying to force cloud services where there is no benefit to the customer (in this instance only a real detriment).
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
I've just done a search (as I needed to change the email address on my tplink account) for this topic and cannot believe how many people have raised this issue.
hardwiring things like home automation and NAS servers to act as sources for streaming is commonplace - and the Deco firmware screwing around with the ethernet ports is totaly unacceptable.
I see that firmware 1.7.1 has 'optimized' the behavior. I don't believe it needs optimizing, it needs fixing as per every other router firmware around - and I can't see a setting in the 1.7.1 to control this function.
So - please can you describe the 'optimized' behaviour for us. What previous versions did was not correct or acceptable and what we all want is to be able to nominate the WAN port(s) (the plural is for anyone with a 4g/5g backup connection). That and for the physical ports to WORK without a connection to a TP-Link cloud service or other WAN connection.
So - please tell us what this firmware now does? (P.S. the annoucement link does not describe the new behaviour!)
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@TP-Link This is unacceptable for such an expensive product. I have two x50 units, and whenever I lose the internet they mess up everything, they also reenabled their own DHCP and giving the same IPs as the rest of my home.
Also every time i have no internet all my IoT devices (wifi lights, wifi switches etc) cannot connect to my LOCAL server and i can't even switch on or off my own lights!!!!! This is ridiculous!!!
edit:
Is it that hard to put a third Operation Mode that just bridges all ethernet ports and wifi?
Deco shouldn't have to know if it has internet connectivity or not. Just bridge all ports, find the other units to make the mesh wifi, and let the rest of the network work on its own without any meddling!!!
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 136
Views: 68574
Replies: 275