304
Votes

Web UI Configuration

 
304
Votes

Web UI Configuration

530 Reply
Re:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-07 21:34:01

Does anyone know how much effort it is to convert an iPhone/Android app to a web UI? Bigger than a breadbox? I understand development is not free and that any development TP-Link does do on this will not reap them any profits because they would be providing this to existing customers, but it could stop people from fleeing to another vendor. I'm an existing customer, but I won't be a future customer if TP-Link continues to treat us like we don't matter.

#492
Options
Re:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-07 21:53:59

  @HibsMax I mean, there are phone testing applications which are used to simulate a phone in order to test an app, and you could use one of those, but generally, the app is designed to use a touchscreen and wouldn't translate super easily. They've already got the web service running on the router, but they refuse to expose the config elements to it, which would be painfully simple.  My bigger problem after looking at the app a bit more is that it is incredibly elementary.  I've been an Asus user for a number of years, and while they aren't the most configurable routers compared to enterprise level stuff, there are a lot of options and capabilities that the Deco just doesn't have.  Even if it did, I'd not want to use my phone to dig through them. I use parental controls intricately, and couple that with an internal DNS server, and comparing logs between router and pihole is useful.  I've got a ton of smart devices that can be challenging and again, sifting through them on a tiny screen is just stupid.  

#493
Options
Re:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-11 01:02:09

  @TP-Link I cannot believe there is no web config.

 

I've been on a Cable based DHCP ISP for years.  I have nearly 100 clients setup in my Deco with reserved IPs, names, etc.  I'm now switching to a fibre PPPoE ISP, it was installed today, and I don't want to cut over because I'm afraid I'll have to factory reset this stupid Deco because I can't FIX IT without the internet working.  What if I enter the user/password, and it doesn't connect?  I can't plug back into the DHCP modem!!

 

What an absolutely horrid design choice - whoever made this decision should be fired.

#494
Options
RE:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-11 01:10:43
You removed basic functionality that cripples the router if it is misconfigured, and requires a factory reset to get back online. What a stupid decision.
#495
Options
Re:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-11 01:27:19

  @TP-Link 

I really like my new set of Deco M5s.

 

BUT  They might have to go back as the web interface is so limited.

 

Having the main controller on a mobile device is a security issue.  It is a much better practice to administer the system from a local machine and skip the mobile device and the need to create a tp-link profile.  

 

thank you for your time.

 

 

#496
Options
RE:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-11 01:28:39
Great thread pointing out obvious defect
#497
Options
RE:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-11 01:34:48

  @nexusDC Thats why I use another router and use the Deco as Access Points...they are absolutely horrible as routers.

#498
Options
RE:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-11 01:40:19

  @Petrock I just love the very first post from TP-Link on this thread. They are open to feedback regarding their decision to make configuration only available via app.

 

Hmmm deaf ears it seems as they still are not listening.

#499
Options
Re:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-12 01:17:12

  @TP-Link I live out in the sticks w/almost no cell coverage.  This is very frustrating to need cell coverage in order to set this system up.

#500
Options
Re:Web UI Configuration
2024-12-14 12:46:41

  @TP-Link 

I received my Deco BE9300 today and I was honestly shocked to see the web UI complete useleness. I managed to setup everything via the app, but why would anyone do that when you have a perfectly good monitor, mouse and keyboard that could make the whole process 5 times faster?

 

The app works but it wasn't a superior experience to a web base configuration wizard at all, if anything it is a lot less responsive than a web page that runs directly on the router. I get the remote control capabilities, but those are topically for advanced users who would know how to set them up anyway...

#501
Options